Notice of the Ordinary meeting of

Nelson City Council

Te Kaunihera o Whakatū

 

Date:                       Tuesday 12 July 2022

Time:                      9.00a.m.

Location:                 Council Chamber
Civic House
110 Trafalgar Street, Nelson

Agenda

Rārangi take

Chairperson                    Her Worship the Mayor Rachel Reese

Deputy Mayor                 Cr Judene Edgar

Members                        Cr Yvonne Bowater

        Cr Trudie Brand

        Cr Mel Courtney

        Cr Kate Fulton

        Cr Matt Lawrey

        Cr Rohan O'Neill-Stevens

        Cr Brian McGurk

        Cr Gaile Noonan

        Cr Pete Rainey

        Cr Rachel Sanson

        Cr Tim Skinner

Quorum   7                          Pat Dougherty

Chief Executive

Nelson City Council Disclaimer

Please note that the contents of these Council and Committee agendas have yet to be considered by Council and officer recommendations may be altered or changed by the Council in the process of making the formal Council decision. For enquiries call (03) 5460436.


Council Values

 

Following are the values agreed during the 2019 – 2022 term:

 

A. Whakautetanga: respect

B. Kōrero Pono: integrity

C. Māiatanga: courage

D. Whakamanatanga: effectiveness

E. Whakamōwaitanga: humility

F. Kaitiakitanga: stewardship

G. Manaakitanga: generosity of spirit

 

 


Nelson City Council

12 July 2022

 

 

Page No.

 

Karakia and Mihi Timatanga

1.       Apologies

Nil

2.       Confirmation of Order of Business

3.       Interests

3.1       Updates to the Interests Register

3.2       Identify any conflicts of interest in the agenda

4.       Public Forum

4.1       Steve Cross - Proposed Holding Company for Port Nelson/Nelson Airport

Steve Cross will speak about the proposed Holding Company for Port Nelson/Nelson Airport.

4.2       The Aotearoa Collective for Public Transport Equity - Remit from Porirua City Council to LGNZ Conference

Lovinia Pluck, Pippa Sussex, Nathan Dunn and Nathan Hughes, from The Aotearoa Collective for Public Transport Equity, will speak in support of the Remit from Porirua City Council to LGNZ Conference.

 

5.       Confirmation of Minutes

5.1       10 May 2022                     20 - 34

Document number M19450

Recommendation

That the Council

1.    Confirms the minutes of the meeting of the Council, held on 10 May 2022, as a true and correct record.

5.2       19 May 2022                     35 - 45

Document number M19472

Recommendation

That the Council

1.    Confirms the minutes of the meeting of the Council, held on 19 May 2022, as a true and correct record.

5.3       Extraordinary Meeting - 26 May 2022                                  46 - 48

Recommendation

That the Council

1.    Confirms the minutes of the extraordinary meeting of the Council, held on 26 May 2022, as a true and correct record.

5.4       7 June 2022                      49 - 51

Recommendation

That the Council

1.    Confirms the minutes of the meeting of the Council, held on 7 June 2022, as a true and correct record.

5.5       14 June 2022                     52 - 66

Document number M19544

Recommendation

That the Council

1.    Confirms the minutes of the meeting of the Council, held on 14 June 2022, as a true and correct record.

5.6       23 June 2022                     67 - 69

Document number M19586

Recommendation

That the Council

1.    Confirms the minutes of the meeting of the Council, held on 23 June 2022, as a true and correct record.

  

6.       Recommendations from Committees 70 - Error! Bookmark not defined.

6.1     Infrastructure Committee - 23 June 2022

6.1.1    Infrastructure Quarterly Report

Recommendation to Council

 

That the Council

3.    Approves unbudgeted additional capital funding of $2 million in 2022/23 for the Washington Valley Infrastructure Upgrade project to cover the cost of previously unidentified and unknown coal tar, a hazardous material, to be disposed of at York Valley Landfill.

 

 

6.2     Community and Recreation Committee - 30 June 2022

6.2.1    Joint Regional Cemetery – Memorandum of Understanding and draft Site Selection Criteria

Recommendation to Council

 

That the Council

1.    Approves the Memorandum of Understanding between Nelson City Council and Tasman District Council for the development of a joint regional cemetery (A2876360) for signing; and

2.    Delegates responsibility for agreeing to any minor changes to the Memorandum of Understanding (A2876360) to the Nelson City Councillor who is Co-Chairperson of the Joint Regional Cemetery Working Group, in consultation with the Co-Chairperson counterpart from Tasman District Council.

 

 

6.2.2    Adoption of the Out and About - On Tracks Strategy 2022

Recommendation to Council

 

That the Council

1.    Adopts the Out and About – On Tracks Strategy 2022 (A2471811); and

2.    Delegates responsibility for agreeing to any minor amendments to the Out and About – On Tracks Strategy 2022 (A2471811) to the Chair of the Community and Recreation Committee and the Group Manager Community Services.

 

6.2.3    Follow Up Review on the Nelson Centre of Musical Arts

Recommendation to Council

 

That the Council

1.    Revokes the decision CL/2019/261 made at the Council meeting on 12 December 2019:

        That the Council

                                                                                                   Agrees to provide business advice to support the Nelson Centre of Musical Arts over January - June 2019/20 up to the value of $10,000 in unbudgeted expenditure, on the understanding that the Nelson Centre of Musical Arts will contribute $5,000 (up to a total value of $15,000).

 

 

7.       Status Report      70 - 109

Document number R26688

Recommendation

That the Council

1.    Receives the report Status Report  (R26688) and its attachment (A1168168).

 

 

8.       Acting Mayor's Report        110 - 134

Document number R26978

Recommendation

That the Council

1.    Receives the report Acting Mayor's Report (R26978) and its attachment (A2909891 and A2913709); and

2.    Supports the proposed Remits to the Local Government New Zealand AGM 2022, as discussed:

a.     Remit 1 – support/not support

b.    Remit 2 - support/not support

c.     Remit 3 - support/not support

d.    Remit 4 - support/not support

e.     Remit 5 - support/not support

f.     Remit 6 - support/not support

3.    Approves Council’s submission to the Electoral (Māori Electoral Option) Legislation Bill.

 

 

9.       Supplementary information - Holding Company decision      135 - 212

Document number R26983

Recommendation

That the Council

1.    Receives the report Supplementary information - Holding Company decision (R26983) and its attachments (A2907846 DLA Piper signoff incl 7 June JSC changes to constitution and SHA, and A2904604 Summary of constitution - changes incl 7 Jun JSC).

Recommendation from the Joint Shareholders Committee

The Council notes that:

Purpose

A.    The purpose of these resolutions is to seek the Council’s approval of the documents and transactions necessary to approve the:

a)    Restructuring Proposals (including the Initial Share Issue); and

b)    Financing Proposals (including the New Share Issue). 

B.    The Restructuring Proposals, Initial Share Issue, Financing Proposals and New Share Issue are explained below.

A new holding company for Port Nelson Limited and Nelson Airport Limited

C.    Nelson City Council and Tasman District Council (together, the Shareholders) have together been investigating the incorporation of a holding company which they will own in equal shares. The holding company will hold and administer investments in entities in which the Shareholders have a substantial interest for the benefit of the Nelson and Tasman regions, being Port Nelson Limited (PNL) and Nelson Airport Limited (NAL). 

D.    Nelson City Council and Tasman District Council through their Long Term Plan process and Joint Shareholders Committee (JSC), have each received and reviewed advice from Deloitte about operational synergies of holding investments, being PNL and NAL, in a holding company, and tax structure options.

E.    The name agreed for the holding company is Infrastructure Holdings Limited (IHL).

F.     The initial directors approved for IHL are Catherine Taylor, Paul Steere, Gerrard Wilson and Paul Zealand and an independent chairperson is being recruited.

Restructuring Proposals

G.    As part of the proposal to incorporate IHL, it is proposed that each of the Shareholders transfer all their shares in PNL and NAL to IHL (Share Sale) for $8,446,000 in total (Purchase Price). The Purchase Price will be owed to the Shareholders in equal portions (being $4,223,000 each). The Crown holds, and will continue to hold, one special “Kiwi Share” in NAL.

H.    The Purchase Price allocation is:

a)    $2,400,000 for the shares in NAL; and

b)    $6,046,000 for the shares in PNL.

I.     Nelson City Council and Tasman District Council will each subscribe for 42,230 ordinary shares in IHL (being 84,460 ordinary shares in total) (Initial Shares), at an issue price of $100.00 per share (Initial Share Issue). The total subscription amount for the Initial Shares is therefore $8,446,000 (Initial Subscription Amount), which is equal to the Purchase Price. 

J.     Accordingly, the Purchase Price will be satisfied on a cashless basis by set-off against the Initial Subscription Amount.

K.    The sale of shares in PNL and NAL and the subscription for the Initial Shares will be referred to in these resolutions as the “Restructuring Proposals”.

Financing Proposals

L.     The New Zealand Local Government Funding Agency Limited (LGFA) is a limited liability company owned by central government and local authorities. It was established to borrow funds and then on-lend those funds to local authorities and (now) council-controlled trading organisations (CCTOs) at lower margins than those local authorities and council-controlled organisations would otherwise pay. 

M.    Currently, PNL and NAL service their debt requirements through ordinary bank borrowing from Westpac New Zealand Limited (Westpac). However, it is projected that PNL’s and NAL’s debt requirements and financing costs may increase over the next 10+ years to meet infrastructure-upgrade demands.

N.    Given the projected increase in PNL’s and NAL’s debt requirements and financing costs, IHL’s primary purpose is to operate as a treasury vehicle for PNL and NAL. To achieve this purpose, it is further proposed that (Financing Proposals) IHL will:

a)    join the LGFA borrowing programme (LGFA Accession) as a CCTO, following which, IHL will be able to borrow funds directly from LGFA by issuing securities to LGFA;

b)    enter into borrowing and risk hedging facilities with Westpac, which is PNL’s and NAL’s current bank; and

c)    on-lend amounts borrowed from the LGFA borrowing programme and Westpac to PNL and NAL under intra-group funding arrangements.

O.    Joining the LGFA borrowing programme will enable IHL to access cheaper core debt on behalf of PNL and NAL. As a “port company” under the Port Companies Act 1988, PNL is not permitted to join LGFA and NAL does not have the scale to make joining LGFA economical.  It is considered that, once implemented, the Financing Proposals will deliver considerable financial benefits, including savings in financing costs for PNL and NAL and, consequently, increased dividend return to Nelson City Council and Tasman District Council (as the ultimate owners of PNL and NAL). Nelson City Council and Tasman District Council through their Long Term Plan process and the JSC have each received and reviewed advice from Deloitte about LGFA funding benefits.

P.    PNL and NAL will continue to require the flexibility offered by Westpac’s transactional banking products. IHL will also enter into borrowing and risk hedging facilities with Westpac for working capital requirements and risk-management (such as interest-rate hedging).

The LGFA Accession and Westpac facilities

Q.    LGFA and Westpac will require certain credit support as conditions to the LGFA Accession and the availability of the Westpac facilities. Such credit support will include:

a)    a subscription from the Shareholders for an agreed amount of uncalled and unpaid equity capital in IHL (further details are described below);

b)    IHL, PNL and NAL will each cross-guarantee each other’s obligations to LGFA, Westpac as lender under borrowing facilities and Westpac as counter-party to risk-management facilities (together, the Finance Parties); and

c)    IHL, PNL and NAL will each grant general security over all of their personal property in favour of the Finance Parties.  In the case of IHL, this will include security over its right to call for uncalled and unpaid equity capital.

R.    As mentioned above, it will be a condition to the LGFA Accession and the availability of the Westpac facilities that the Shareholders subscribe for, and IHL issues to the Shareholders (New Share Issue), a further 1,165,000 ordinary shares each (totalling 2,330,000 ordinary shares) in IHL (New Shares) for an issue price of $100.00 per share. The total amount payable for the New Shares will therefore be $233,000,000 (Issue Amount). The Issue Amount will remain uncalled and unpaid until such time as the directors of IHL make a call on the New Shares for the Issue Amount. 

Shareholder approvals

S.    The Restructuring Proposals and the Financing Proposals will require the approval of the Shareholders as:

a)    the proposals are, or may be, “major transactions” (as defined in section 129 of the Companies Act 1993 (Act));

b)    the Initial Share Issue and the New Share Issue require the agreement of IHL’s entitled persons (as that term is defined in the Act) for the purposes of section 107(2) of the Act. The only entitled persons of IHL will be the Shareholders; and

c)    Nelson City Council and Tasman District Council (as the shareholders of IHL) must consent, for the purposes of section 50 of the Act and for all other purposes, to becoming the holder of the Initial Shares and the New Shares.

T.    Accordingly, IHL’s board of directors will, at the relevant times, separately request that Tasman District Council and Nelson City Council (as shareholders and entitled persons of IHL) confirm and approve IHL’s entry into, execution and performance, of the:

a)    Restructuring Proposals (including the Initial Share Issue); and

b)    Financing Proposals (including the New Share Issue),

by separate unanimous resolutions and entitled persons’ agreements.  The unanimous resolutions and entitled persons’ agreements for the Restructuring Proposals and the Financing Proposals are together referred to as the “Unanimous Shareholder Resolutions and Entitled Persons’ Agreements”.

Next steps

U.    In order to incorporate IHL and give effect to the Restructuring Proposals, the Shareholders will need to:

a)     register IHL as a limited liability company on the New Zealand Companies Office and each complete the Companies Office requirements in relation to the incorporation of IHL (such as shareholder consent forms) (Companies Office Forms);

b)     appoint directors to the board of IHL (including an independent chairperson);

c)     cause IHL to adopt the constitution in the form attached (the Constitution);

d)     enter into a shareholders’ agreement (which will include the subscription provisions for the Initial Shares) with IHL, in the form attached (the Shareholders’ Agreement);

e)     enter into a sale and purchase agreement with IHL relating to the transfer of shares in PNL and NAL in the form attached (the Sale and Purchase Agreement);

f)     execute and deliver the share transfer forms (in the form attached) in relation to the Sale and Purchase Agreement (the Share Transfer Forms); and

g)     any other documents necessary or desirable in connection with the Restructuring Proposals.

The Companies Office Forms, Shareholders’ Agreement, Sale and Purchase Agreement, Share Transfer Forms and any other documents captured by paragraph U.g) above, are together referred to as the “Restructuring Documents”, and the transactions contemplated by the Restructuring Documents are referred to as the “Restructuring Transactions”.

V.    In order to give effect to the Financing Proposals, each of the Shareholders will need to enter into:

a)     a subscription agreement (in the form attached) with IHL, under which the Shareholders will subscribe for the New Shares (Subscription Agreement);

b)     (as part of the LGFA Accession) accession deeds to the multi-issuer deed and notes subscription agreement (which Tasman District Council and Nelson City Council are each already a party to) (Accession Deeds); and

c)     any other documents necessary or desirable in connection with the Financing Proposals.

The Subscription Agreement, the Accession Deeds and any other documents captured by paragraph 0 are together referred to as the “Financing Documents” and the transactions contemplated by the Financing Documents are referred to as the “Financing Transactions”.

Documents

W.   The Council tables the most recent drafts of the Restructuring Documents, the Subscription Agreement and the Unanimous Shareholder Resolutions and Entitled Persons’ Agreements.

X.    The Council has not tabled copies of the Accession Deeds because they are not yet available for the Council to review and approve.  However, the Accession Deeds will be based on the standard form for accession deeds scheduled to the LGFA Multi-Issuer Deed and Notes Subscription Agreement respectively.

That the Council resolves:

1.    the Council consents, for the purposes of section 50 of the Act and for all other purposes, to being the joint owner in equal shares of the Initial Shares and the New Shares;

2.    the form of the Constitution be approved, and the Shareholders will cause IHL to adopt the Constitution;

3.    the Restructuring Documents and the Restructuring Transactions (including, specifically, the Initial Share Issue) are approved, and any pre-emptive rights available to the Shareholders in relation to the Share Sale are to be waived in the Sale and Purchase Agreement;

4.    the Financing Documents and the Financing Transactions (including, specifically, the New Share Issue) are approved;

5.    the forms of the Unanimous Shareholder Resolutions and Entitled Persons’ Agreements are approved;

6.    the Council enters into and, following execution, delivers and performs its obligations under, each of the Restructuring Documents and the Financing Documents and that these documents may be executed by:

a)    (in the case of agreements) the Chief Executive; and

b)    (in the case of deeds) two elected members,

on behalf of the Council, subject to any minor amendments cleared by both Tasman District Council’s and Nelson City Council’s legal advisors;

7.    when requested to do so by the board of IHL, the Chief Executive is authorised to sign the Unanimous Shareholder Resolutions and Entitled Persons’ Agreements on behalf of the Council, subject to any minor amendments cleared by both TDC’s and NCC’s legal advisors;

8.    the Chief Executive is authorised on behalf of the Council to, subject to clearance by both Tasman District Council’s and Nelson City Council’s legal advisors:

a)    approve any further minor amendments to the Restructuring Documents, the Financing Documents and the Unanimous Shareholder Resolutions and Entitled Persons’ Agreements prior to their execution; ands

b)    enter into, execute, and deliver such other agreements, instruments, notices, communications, and other documents; and

c)    do such other things, in connection with the Restructuring Documents and the Restructuring Transactions, the Financing Documents and the Financing Transactions, and the Unanimous Shareholder Resolutions and Entitled Persons’ Agreements, as the Chief Executive may consider necessary.

 

 

10.     Water Services Entities Bill Submission 213 - 220

Document number R27006

Recommendation

That the Council

1.    Receives the report Water Services Entities Bill Submission (R27006); and the Engagement Summary (A2919612) and Complete Feedback (A2919617) and

2.    Approves the draft Council submission (A2918988) to the Finance and Expenditure Select Committee on the Water Services Entities Bill; and

3.    Agrees that the Mayor, Infrastructure Committee Chair and Chief Executive be delegated authority to approve minor editorial amendments to the Council submission (A2918988).

 

 

11.     Tahunanui off-street parking       221 - 241

Document number R26497

Recommendation

That the Council

1.    Receives the report Tahunanui off-street parking (R26497) and its attachments (A2906154 and  A2909737); and

2.    Notes the work undertaken to explore off-street parking options pending the reinstatement of the Tahunanui southbound merge lanes by Waka Kotahi; and

3.    Notes that no reasonably practical proposal option to replace off-street parking when Waka Kotahi reinstates the southbound Tahunanui Drive merge lanes has been identified at this stage; and 

4.    Notes that officers will continue to explore options and report any opportunities back to Council; and  

5.    Notes that officers will continue to work and liaise with Waka Kotahi to ensure that safety matters are addressed for all users prior to the reinstatement of the Tahunanui southbound merge lanes. 

 

 

12.     Outdoor Dining Structure on Hardy Street         242 - 249

Document number R26987

Recommendation

That the Council

1.    Receives the report Request for Outdoor Dining Structure on Hardy Street (R26987) and its attachment (A2910349); and

2.    Approves the application for an outdoor dining structure outside 274-278 Hardy Street (Parts & Services and Urban), subject to the applicant securing all consents and all necessary Council signoffs; and

3.    Approves an outdoor dining structure outside 280 Hardy Street (Sprig and Fern) should an application be received, subject to the applicant securing all consents and all necessary Council signoffs; and

4.    Delegates all future approvals for outdoor dining structures to the Chief Executive.   

 

  

Confidential Business

13.     Exclusion of the Public

Recommendation

That the Council

1.       Excludes the public from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting.

2.       The general subject of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter and the specific grounds under section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution are as follows: 

 

Item

General subject of each matter to be considered

Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter

Particular interests protected (where applicable)

1

Council Meeting - Confidential Minutes - 10 May 2022

Section 48(1)(a)

The public conduct of this matter would be likely to result in disclosure of information for which good reason exists under section 7.

The withholding of the information is necessary:

Section 7(2)(i)

   To enable the local authority to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations)

2

Council Meeting - Confidential Minutes - 19 May 2022

Section 48(1)(a)

The public conduct of this matter would be likely to result in disclosure of information for which good reason exists under section 7.

The withholding of the information is necessary:

·    Section 7(2)(a)

     To protect the privacy of natural persons, including that of a deceased person

·    Section 7(2)(i)

     To enable the local authority to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations)

·    Section 7(2)(h)

     To enable the local authority to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities

·    Section 7(2)(c)(ii)

     To protect information which is subject to an obligation of confidence or which any person has been or could be compelled to provide under the authority of any enactment, where the making available of the information would be likely otherwise to damage the public interest

3

Extraordinary Council Meeting - Confidential Minutes - 26 May 2022

Section 48(1)(a)

The public conduct of this matter would be likely to result in disclosure of information for which good reason exists under section 7.

The withholding of the information is necessary:

·    Section 7(2)(a)

     To protect the privacy of natural persons, including that of a deceased person

4

Council Meeting - Confidential Minutes - 7 June 2022

Section 48(1)(a)

The public conduct of this matter would be likely to result in disclosure of information for which good reason exists under section 7.

The withholding of the information is necessary:

·    Section 7(2)(a)

     To protect the privacy of natural persons, including that of a deceased person

·    Section 7(2)(i)

     To enable the local authority to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations)

5

Council Meeting - Confidential Minutes - 14 June 2022

Section 48(1)(a)

The public conduct of this matter would be likely to result in disclosure of information for which good reason exists under section 7.

The withholding of the information is necessary:

·    Section 7(2)(a)

     To protect the privacy of natural persons, including that of a deceased person

6

Extraordinary Council Meeting - Confidential Minutes - 5 July 2022

Section 48(1)(a)

The public conduct of this matter would be likely to result in disclosure of information for which good reason exists under section 7.

The withholding of the information is necessary:

·    Section 7(2)(a)

     To protect the privacy of natural persons, including that of a deceased person

·    Section 7(2)(i)

     To enable the local authority to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations)

 

Recommendations from Committees

 

 

10

Environment and Climate Committee - 16 June 2022

Harbourmaster vessel

Section 48(1)(a)

The public conduct of this matter would be likely to result in disclosure of information for which good reason exists under section 7

The withholding of the information is necessary:

·      Section 7(2)(i)

     To enable the local authority to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations)

7

Status Report - Confidential

Section 48(1)(a)

The public conduct of this matter would be likely to result in disclosure of information for which good reason exists under section 7

The withholding of the information is necessary:

·    Section 7(2)(a)

     To protect the privacy of natural persons, including that of a deceased person

·    Section 7(2)(h)

     To enable the local authority to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities

·    Section 7(2)(i)

     To enable the local authority to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations)

8

Confidential Attachment to Report R26950: Supplementary information - Holding Company decision

Section 48(1)(a)

The public conduct of this matter would be likely to result in disclosure of information for which good reason exists under section 7

The withholding of the information is necessary:

·    Section 7(2)(h)

     To enable the local authority to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities

9

Nelson Tasman Regional Landfill Business Unit Iwi Representative Re-appointment

Section 48(1)(a)

The public conduct of this matter would be likely to result in disclosure of information for which good reason exists under section 7

The withholding of the information is necessary:

·    Section 7(2)(a)

     To protect the privacy of natural persons, including that of a deceased person

 

 

Karakia Whakamutanga

 

  

 


Nelson City Council Minutes - 10 May 2022

 

 

 

Minutes of a meeting of the

Nelson City Council

Te Kaunihera o Whakatū

Held in the Council Chamber, Civic House, 110 Trafalgar Street, Nelson on Tuesday 10 May 2022, commencing at 9.09a.m.

 

Present:              Her Worship the Mayor R Reese (Chairperson), Councillors Y Bowater, T Brand, M Courtney, J Edgar (Deputy Mayor), K Fulton, M Lawrey, R O'Neill-Stevens, B McGurk, G Noonan, P Rainey, R Sanson and T Skinner

In Attendance:     Chief Executive (P Dougherty), Group Manager Infrastructure (A Louverdis), Group Manager Environmental Management (C Barton), Group Manager Community Services (A White), Group Manager Corporate Services (N Harrison), Team Leader Governance (R Byrne) and Governance Adviser (T Kruger)

Apology:              Nil

 

Karakia and Mihi Timatanga

1.       Apologies

There were no apologies.

2.       Confirmation of Order of Business

Her Worship the Mayor advised that the Chief Executive had withdrawn Item 10:  Nelson Regional Development Agency Statement of Intent 2022/2023 from the Agenda, noting there were some details to finalise and it would be brought to the June Council meeting. 

Her Worship the Mayor advised of a late item for the confidential part of the meeting, and that the following resolution needed to be passed for the item to be considered:

2.1       Mayor's Report - Leave of Absence

Resolved CL/2022/038

 

That the Council

1.    Considers the confidential item regarding Mayor’s Report  - Leave of Absence at this meeting as a major item not on the agenda, pursuant to Section 46A(7)(a) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987, to enable a timely decision to be made.

Her Worship the Mayor/Edgar                                                        Carried

 

 

3.       Interests-

There were no updates to the Interests Register, and no interests with items on the agenda were declared.

4.       Public Forum

There was no public forum.

5.       Confirmation of Minutes

5.1       17 February 2022

Document number M19236, agenda pages 13 - 19 refer.

Resolved CL/2022/039

 

That the Council

1.    Confirms the minutes of the meeting of the Council, held on 17 February 2022, as a true and correct record.

Rainey/Brand                                                                                Carried

5.2       10 March 2022

Document number M19293, agenda pages 20 - 28 refer.

Resolved CL/2022/040

 

That the Council

1.    Confirms the minutes of the meeting of the Council, held on 10 March 2022, as a true and correct record.

McGurk/Brand                                                                               Carried

5.3       23 March 2022

Document number M19349, agenda pages 29 - 39 refer.

Resolved CL/2022/041

 

That the Council

1.    Confirms the minutes of the meeting of the Council, held on 23 March 2022, as a true and correct record.

Brand/McGurk                                                                               Carried

5.4       21 April 2022 - Extraordinary Meeting , agenda pages 40 - 42 refer.

Resolved CL/2022/042

 

That the Council

1.    Confirms the minutes of the extraordinary meeting of the Council, held on 21 April 2022, as a true and correct record.

O'Neill-Stevens/Fulton                                                                   Carried

  

6.       Recommendations from Committees

 

6.1     Civil Defence and Emergency Management Group – 22 March 2022

6.1.1    Terms of Reference for Civil Defence Emergency Management Group (CDEM Group)

Recommendation to Tasman District and Nelson City Council CL/2022/043

 

That the Councils

1.  Approve the Terms of Reference for the Civil Defence Emergency Management Group (A2856095).

Her Worship the Mayor/Edgar                                                        Carried

6.2     Strategic Development and Property Subcommittee - 24 March 2022

6.2.1    Nelson Marina Governance Review

Recommendation to Council CL/2022/044

 

That the Council

1.    Approves the formation of a Management Council Controlled Organisation (Management CCO) for Nelson Marina.

2.    Approves the development of a Statement of Expectation, Statement of Intent, a Management Agreement, and recommended board structure for Nelson Marina by the Strategic Development and Property Subcommittee for consideration by Council.

3.     Confirms that the Manager of Nelson Marina will not            be appointed to the Council Controlled Organisation,         Marina Management Governance Board.

Noonan/Bowater                                                                           Carried

 

6.2.2    Millers Acre Re-cladding Project

Recommendation to Council CL/2022/045

 

That the Council

1.    Approves the allocation of an additional unbudgeted amount of $625,000 in 2022/23 to complete the remedial cladding system for Millers Acre and installation of a comprehensive height safety harness point system; and

2.    Notes that investigation into improvements to the northern end of the ground floor of Millers Acre (currently leased to the Department of Conservation) to provide additional window opening and external customer access is underway and will be presented to a future Subcommittee as a matter of urgent business.

Noonan/O'Neill-Stevens                                                                 Carried

6.3     Infrastructure Committee - 31 March 2022

6.3.1    Sandbag Policy Options

The recommendation was taken in parts.

Recommendation to Council CL/2022/046

 

That the Council

1.    Confirms that Council does not support the general provision of sandbags, sand, or bags, to private property owners/occupants prior to or during flood events; and

Carried

2.    Notes that officers are working in conjunction with the Nelson Tasman Emergency Management Group to promote flood readiness to the community, and specifically to those property owners located within the flood hazard/coastal inundation overlay.

McGurk/Edgar                                                                               Carried

 

6.3.2    Hampden Street (west) Intersection with Waimea Road-   Long term closure to motor vehicles

Recommendation to Council CL/2022/047

 

That the Council

1.    Approves that the intersection of Waimea Road and Hampden Street (west) be closed to vehicular traffic long-term by determining under section 319(1)(f) of the Local Government Act 1974 that part of the Hampden Street (west) road is footpath and cycle track.

McGurk/O'Neill-Stevens                                                                 Carried

 

6.4.3    Tahunanui Catchment 4 Stormwater

Recommendation to Council CL/2022/048

 

That the Council

1.    Approves bringing forward budgeted capital funding of $350,000 from 2024/25 to 2021/22, to allow early completion of the Tahunanui Catchment 4 stormwater project in 2021/22. 

McGurk/O'Neill-Stevens                                                                 Carried

 

6.5     Environment and Climate Committee - 7 April 2022

6.5.1    Deliberations and Decision Report on Amended Urban Environments Bylaw - Deferred from 24 March 2022

Group Manager Environment, Clare Barton, and Manager Environment, Maxine Day, answered questions on signage, cats, consequences of the Bylaw not be passed and confirmed that the Bylaw had been legally reviewed, including whether it met the requirements of the Bill of Rights. 

The meeting was adjourned 10.20a.m. at which time Councillor Sanson left the meeting. 

The meeting reconvened at 10.45a.m.

In response to a question on whether a member could vote if they had not attended the Environment and Climate Committee meeting, Manager Legal Services, Fiona McLeod, confirmed that all members had the capacity to vote.   She noted it was important that they were well informed about issues raised by submitters and the officers response to those issues, which was set out in the deliberations report, and that there was a link to the report in the agenda. 

Recommendation to Council CL/2022/049

 

That the Council

1.    Determines following consideration of submissions, that the amendments to the Urban Environments Bylaw as shown in Attachment 2 (A2848140) of the Deliberations Report on Amended Urban Environments Bylaw (R26653) are the most appropriate way of addressing the perceived problems with the current Bylaw; are the most appropriate form of Bylaw and do not give rise to any implications under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990; and

2.    Adopts the amended Urban Environments Bylaw as shown in Attachment 2 (A2848140) of the Deliberations Report on Amended Urban Environments Bylaw (R26653); and

3.    Determines the date that the amended Urban Environment Bylaw will commence as being 1 June 2022.

 

The motion was put and a division was called:

For

Cr Brand

Cr Courtney

Cr Fulton

Cr Lawrey

Cr McGurk

Cr Rainey

Her Worship the Mayor Reese (Chairperson)

Against

Cr Bowater

Cr Edgar

Cr O'Neill-Stevens

Cr Skinner

Abstained

Cr Noonan

 

Absent

Cr Sanson

The motion was carried 7 - 4.

Courtney/Lawrey                                                                           Carried

 

Attendance: Councillor Sanson joined the meeting at 10.54a.m.

 

7.       Proposal to Amend the National Environmental Standards for Sources of Human Drinking Water - Submission to Ministry for the Environment. (Agenda Item 8)

Document number R26724, agenda pages 52 - 69 refer.

In response to a question on small water supplies, Chief Executive, Pat Dougherty, advised that initially the focus would be prioritised on larger supplies and this would be indicated in the submission.

Resolved CL/2022/050

 

That the Council

1.    Receives the report Proposal to Amend the National Environmental Standards for Sources of Human Drinking Water - Submission to Ministry for the Environment. (R26724) and its attachment (A2843003); and

2.    Approves retrospectively the Nelson City Council submission to the Ministry for the Environment  (A2843003 - Attachment 1 of Report R26724).

McGurk/Courtney                                                                          Carried

 

8.       Nelmac Limited Six Month Report to 31 December 2021 (Agenda Item 11)

Document number R26683, agenda pages 163 - 172 refer.

Chief Executive Jane Sheard, Board Member Robb Gunn, and Chief Financial Officer Lindsay Coll (via Zoom) were in attendance to present the Nelmac Ltd report and answered questions on the divestment of the refuse business and impacts of COVID.   

Attendance: Councillor Sanson left the meeting 10.55a.m.

Jane Sheard spoke to the initiatives for increasing and retaining their workforce, these included apprenticeships, mentorship, Jobs for Nature,  long induction programmes, flexible working and no age limit. 

Attendance: Councillor Sanson joined the meeting at 11.21a.m.

Resolved CL/2022/051

 

That the Council

1.    Receives the report Nelmac Limited Six Month Report to 31 December 2021 (R26683) and its attachment (A2848711).

Her Worship the Mayor/Noonan                                                      Carried

9        Exclusion of the Public

Jane Sheard, Rob Gunn and Lindsay Coll of Nelmac, were in attendance for Item 4 of the Confidential agenda to answer questions and, accordingly, the following resolution was required to be passed:

Resolved CL/2022/052

 

That the Council

1.    Confirms, in accordance with sections 48(5) and 48(6) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987, that Jane Sheard, Rob Gunn and Lindsay Coll of Nelmac remain after the public has been excluded, for Item 4 of the Confidential agenda (Nelmac Limited Draft Statement of Intent 2022/23), as have knowledge relating to the Draft Statement of Intent that will assist the meeting.

Resolved CL/2022/053

Brand/Courtney                                                                             Carried

 

That the Council

1.    Excludes the public from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting.

The general subject of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter and the specific grounds under section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution are as follows: 

Brand/Courtney                                                                             Carried

 

Item

General subject of each matter to be considered

Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter

Particular interests protected (where applicable)

4

Nelmac Limited Draft Statement of Intent 2022/23

Section 48(1)(a)

The public conduct of this matter would be likely to result in disclosure of information for which good reason exists under section 7

The withholding of the information is necessary:

·    Section 7(2)(i)

     To enable the local authority to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations)

 

The meeting went into confidential session at 11.25a.m. and resumed in public session at 12.22p.m. at which time the meeting adjourned.

The meeting reconvened at 1.04p.m. at which time Councillor Sanson was not present.

10.     Nelson Regional Development Agency Six Month Report - July - December 2021 (Agenda Item 9)

Document number R26701, agenda pages 70 - 104 refer.

Manager Strategy, Pip Jamieson, presented  the report.

Chief Executive Fiona Wilson, Chair Meg Matthews,  Board Member Hugh Morrison  and NRDA staff Tracee Nelson, Marg Macguire, and Toni Power were in attendance to answer questions and spoke to a presentation (tabled A2885960).

Ms Wilson answered questions on opportunities for the creative sector, promoting the region as an attractive remote working location and encouraging people to return to the city centre.

Attendance:  Councillor Sanson joined the meeting at 1.48p.m.

Resolved CL/2022/054

 

That the Council

1.    Receives the report Nelson Regional Development Agency Six Month Report - July - December 2021 (R26701) and its attachment (A2855269).

Her Worship the Mayor/Courtney                                                   Carried

Attachments

1    A2885960 NRDA Presentation

 

11.     Nelson Regional Development Agency Statement of Intent 2022/2023

Document number R26709, agenda pages 105 - 162 refer.

The Chief Executive withdrew this item from the Agenda.

12.     Mayor's Report (Agenda Item 7)

Document number R26751, late items agenda pages 4 - 8 refer.

Her Worship the Mayor presented the report and advised Gisborne District Council (GDC) were seeking Council’s support for a proposed Remit on Gambling Harm to be submitted to the LGNZ AGM.  Deputy Mayor Edgar had been in discussion with GDC to add a reference to a review of funding for charities, they had agreed to add:

“Advocate for a review of funding for charities and community organisations to lessen or remove the reliance on gaming machine trusts."

It was noted that this was a key piece of work to be completed alongside any changes to the Gambling Act as funds from gambling often went towards funding community organisations. 

Her Worship the Mayor advised that two projects submitted to the Infrastructure Acceleration Fund were through to the final stage.

Resolved CL/2022/055

 

That the Council

1.    Receives the report Mayor's Report (R26751) and its attachments (A2883846 and A2883833); and

2.    Supports Gisborne District Council’s proposed remit to Local Government New Zealand as set out in Attachment 1 (A2883846) and asks the Mayor to advise Gisborne District Council accordingly.

Edgar/Noonan                                                                               Carried

  

13.     Exclusion of the Public

Resolved CL/2022/056

 

That the Council

2.    Excludes the public from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting.

3.    The general subject of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter and the specific grounds under section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution are as follows:  

Her Worship the Mayor/Brand                                                        Carried

 

Item

General subject of each matter to be considered

Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter

Particular interests protected (where applicable)

1.1

Council Meeting - Confidential Minutes - 17 February 2022

Section 48(1)(a)

The public conduct of this matter would be likely to result in disclosure of information for which good reason exists under section 7.

The withholding of the information is necessary:

·    Section 7(2)(a)

     To protect the privacy of natural persons, including that of a deceased person

1.2

Council Meeting - Confidential Minutes - 10 March 2022

Section 48(1)(a)

The public conduct of this matter would be likely to result in disclosure of information for which good reason exists under section 7.

The withholding of the information is necessary:

·    Section 7(2)(a)

     To protect the privacy of natural persons, including that of a deceased person

·    Section 7(2)(g)

     To maintain legal professional privilege

·    Section 7(2)(i)

     To enable the local authority to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations)

1.3

Council Meeting - Confidential Minutes - 23 March 2022

Section 48(1)(a)

The public conduct of this matter would be likely to result in disclosure of information for which good reason exists under section 7.

The withholding of the information is necessary:

·    Section 7(2)(i)

     To enable the local authority to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations)

·    Section 7(2)(a)

     To protect the privacy of natural persons, including that of a deceased person

1.4

Extraordinary Council Meeting - Confidential Minutes - 21 April 2022

Section 48(1)(a)

The public conduct of this matter would be likely to result in disclosure of information for which good reason exists under section 7.

The withholding of the information is necessary:

·    Section 7(2)(a)

     To protect the privacy of natural persons, including that of a deceased person

2

Confirmation of Confidential Minutes - Council -17 February 2022

Section 48(1)(a)

The public conduct of this matter would be likely to result in disclosure of information for which good reason exists under section 7

The withholding of the information is necessary:

·    Section 7(2)(a)

     To protect the privacy of natural persons, including that of a deceased person

3.

Recommendations from Committees

 

Infrastructure Committee - 31 March 2022

Walters Bluff Rd extension - strategic land purchase

Infrastructure Committee - 31 March 2022

Part of Forests Road - proposed road stopping

Urban Development Subcommittee - 14 April 2022

Totara Street Requests for Proposal

 

Section 48(1)(a)

The public conduct of this matter would be likely to result in disclosure of information for which good reason exists under section 7

The withholding of the information is necessary:

·      Section 7(2)(a)

        To protect the privacy of natural persons, including that of a deceased person

·      Section 7(2)(h)

        To enable the local authority to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities

·         Section 7(2)(i)

        To enable the local authority to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations)

5

Supplementary Information -
Rutherford Street Stormwater Upgrade

Section 48(1)(a)

The public conduct of this matter would be likely to result in disclosure of information for which good reason exists under section 7

The withholding of the information is necessary:

·    Section 7(2)(i)

     To enable the local authority to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations)

6

Proposal to Purchase City Centre Property

Section 48(1)(a)

The public conduct of this matter would be likely to result in disclosure of information for which good reason exists under section 7

The withholding of the information is necessary:

·    Section 7(2)(i)

     To enable the local authority to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations)

7

Proposed Sale of part of Haven Road Property

Section 48(1)(a)

The public conduct of this matter would be likely to result in disclosure of information for which good reason exists under section 7

The withholding of the information is necessary:

·    Section 7(2)(h)

     To enable the local authority to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities

·    Section 7(2)(i)

     To enable the local authority to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations)

8

Proposal for property purchase for sea sports facility

Section 48(1)(a)

The public conduct of this matter would be likely to result in disclosure of information for which good reason exists under section 7

The withholding of the information is necessary:

·    Section 7(2)(i)

     To enable the local authority to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations)

9

Mayor's Report - Leave of Absence

Section 48(1)(a)

The public conduct of this matter would be likely to result in disclosure of information for which good reason exists under section 7

The withholding of the information is necessary:

·    Section 7(2)(a)

     To protect the privacy of natural persons, including that of a deceased person

The meeting went into confidential session at 2.25p.m. and resumed in public session at 4.58p.m.

 

Karakia Whakamutanga

 

 

14.     Restatements

 

It was resolved while the public was excluded:

 

4

Recommendations from Committee:

Part of Forests Road - proposed road stopping

 

Agrees that the decision will be publicly available once negotiations are concluded.

 

Totara Street Requests for Proposal

 

Agrees that Report (R26579), Attachment (A2838598) and the decision be made publicly available once negotiations are concluded.

 

Nelmac Limited Draft Statement of Intent 2022/23

 

Agrees that Report (R26684), Attachment (A2848713) and the decision remain confidential at this time.

 

5

Mayor's Report - Leave of Absence

 

Agrees the Decision remain confidential at this time

 

6

Supplementary Information -
Rutherford Street Stormwater Upgrade

 

Agrees that this decision be made publicly available once the contract has been signed by all parties.

 

7

Proposal to Purchase City Centre Property

 

Agrees that report R26824 and the decision be made publicly available once a sale and purchase agreement becomes unconditional.

 

8

Proposed Sale of part of Haven Road Property

 

This item was deferred to the 19 May 2022 Council meeting.

 

9

Proposal for property purchase for sea sports facility

 

This item was deferred to the 19 May 2022 Council meeting.

 

 

There being no further business the meeting ended at 4.59p.m.

 

Confirmed as a correct record of proceedings by resolution on (date)

 

Resolved

 

 

     


Nelson City Council Minutes - 19 May 2022

 

 

 

Minutes of a meeting of the

Nelson City Council

Te Kaunihera o Whakatū

Held via Zoom on Thursday 19 May 2022, commencing at 11.04a.m.

 

Present:              Her Worship the Mayor R Reese (Chairperson), Councillors Y Bowater, T Brand, M Courtney, J Edgar (Deputy Mayor), K Fulton, M Lawrey, R O'Neill-Stevens, B McGurk, G Noonan, P Rainey, R Sanson and T Skinner

In Attendance:     Chief Executive (P Dougherty), Group Manager Infrastructure (A Louverdis), Group Manager Environmental Management (C Barton), Group Manager Community Services (A White), Group Manager Corporate Services (N Harrison), Group Manager Strategy and Communications (N McDonald), Team Leader Governance (R Byrne)  and Assistant Governance Adviser (A Bryce-Neumann)

Apologies :          Nil

 

Karakia and Mihi Timatanga

1.       Apologies

2.       Confirmation of Order of Business

Her Worship the Mayor advised that the meeting would consider Confidential Agenda Item 4:  Options Investigation - regional visitor services at 1.00pm in order to allow representatives of Nelson Regional Development Agency to attend. Other items may be taken out of order to facilitate a timely meeting.

 

3.       Interests

There were no updates to the Interests Register, and no interests with items on the agenda were declared.

4.       Public Forum

There was no public forum.

    5.   Mayor's Report

Document number R26897

Her Worship the Mayor Reese spoke about the noteworthy occasion attended that morning, the mihi whakatau to new Māori representative members to Council Committees.

She noted that members were made aware of the earthquake prone building status of Civic House and the old post office on 12 May. She noted this was a lot of information for Elected Members, staff and in particular those on Level 6 who had to vacate. Chief Executive, Pat Dougherty, advised an independent assessment would be undertaken in affected areas, and based on the risk assessment the building did not need to be closed.

Her Worship the Mayor advised that, to allow the Chief Executive time to provide answers to members questions, the matter would be discussed at the Audit, Risk and Finance Subcommittee meeting on 24 May. 

The Mayor’s Report Item was adjourned and reconvened at Item 10 of the meeting at which time Registrations to the Local Government Commission AGM were discussed.

Attachments

1    A2891782 LGNZ AGM 2022 Registration

 

6.       Order of candidate names on voting papers (Agenda Item 7)

Document number R26726, agenda pages 24 - 28 refer.

Resolved CL/2022/073

 

That the Council

1.    Receives the report Order of candidate names on voting papers  (R26726); and

2.    Approves candidate names being presented in computerised random order for voting papers used in the 2022 triennial local election in Nelson, as well as any local government elections in Nelson through until 30 June 2025.

Edgar/Her Worship the Mayor                                                        Carried

      

7.       Updated Options on Housing Plan Change Pathway (
Agenda Item 6)

Document number R26836, agenda pages 7 - 23 refer.

Manager Environment, Maxine Day presented the report with Principal Planner, Natasha Wilson, and legal adviser Kerry Anderson from DLA Piper were in attendance to answer questions.

Ms Day noted that she had changed the officers recommendation from the report put to the Environment and Climate Committee on 7 April.  She now recommended Council use the standard Schedule 1 process as this was the most achievable given current resources, although it did  present the largest risk of appeals at the end of the process.

Ms Day, Ms Wilson and Ms Anderson answered questions on:

·     Intensification Streamlined Planning Process (ISPP);

private plan change may need to be brought into Council’s plan change and be renotified.

Prior consultation work resource heavy 

can only use the ISPP process once – government’s intention was to make a difference on housing capacity as soon as possible

Legal effect takes place as soon as Council notified its plan change

·     Streamlined Planning Process (SPP)

Private Plan Change 29 (PPC29) would be the biggest the Ministry had dealt with, the Minister would want broader scope, consultation with other Ministries which would take a number of months and further consultation if requested

Legal effect takes place on direction from the Minister and to items in the plan if no submission in opposition were received;

·     Schedule 1 process.

Risk of appeals – there are some mechanisms to try to minimise risk and extent of appeals.

Legal effect takes place to items in the plan if no submissions in opposition were received.

·     The Future Development Strategy and response to outcomes. 

·     Members’ correspondence from Nelson Tasman 2050 and introducing a proposal for medium density residential standards

·     To retain an element of influence on design in the city centre it would be best to take a route other than ISPP

·     Concerns about intensification occurring on low value land on the outskirts of the city

·     How climate change adaptation and mitigation could be identified in the Plan Change.

The item was adjourned to consider an item in Confidential session.

8        Exclusion of the Public

Resolved CL/2022/074

 

 

That the Council

1.    Confirms, in accordance with sections 48(5) and 48(6) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987, that Meg Matthews, Fiona Wilson, Toni Power, Tracee Nelson, Mark Maguire and Dave Johnston of NRDA remain after the public has been excluded, for Item 4 of the Confidential agenda (Options Investigation - regional visitor services), as they have  knowledge relating to regional visitor services that will assist the meeting.

2.    Excludes the public from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting; and

3.    The general subject of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter and the specific grounds under section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution are as follows:

 

Her Worship the Mayor/Edgar                                                        Carried

 

 

4

Options Investigation - regional visitor services

Section 48(1)(a)

The public conduct of this matter would be likely to result in disclosure of information for which good reason exists under section 7

The withholding of the information is necessary:

·    Section 7(2)(a)

     To protect the privacy of natural persons, including that of a deceased person

·    Section 7(2)(c)(ii)

     To protect information which is subject to an obligation of confidence or which any person has been or could be compelled to provide under the authority of any enactment, where the making available of the information would be likely otherwise to damage the public interest

·    Section 7(2)(h)

     To enable the local authority to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities

·    Section 7(2)(i)

     To enable the local authority to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations)

The meeting went into confidential session at 12.22p.m. and resumed in public session at 1.51p.m.

9        Updated Options on Housing Plan Change Pathway (Reconvened)

During discussion members agreed that ISPP was not a preferred pathway and Ms Day provided an amended recommendation that clarified this and also requested an analysis of the Nelson Tasman 2050 housing provisions. Her Worship the Mayor Reese moved the officer’s amended recommendation, seconded by Councillor McGurk.

An addendum motion was proposed by Councillor Fulton and Councillor Sanson, and was agreed to be taken separately. 

Resolved CL/2022/075

 

That the Council

1.    Receives the report Updated Options on Housing Plan Change Pathway (R26836) and its attachment (MDRS Standards Model Factsheet 2022 A2879466); and

2.    Agrees in principle that the Resource Management Act Schedule 1 Process is the preferred planning pathway for Housing Plan Change 29; and

3.    Notes that Council does not support the Intensification Streamlined Planning Process for Housing Plan Change 29; and

4.    Requests officers undertake an analysis of the housing provisions put forward by Nelson Tasman 2050  and presents Council with options for inclusion in a potential Housing Plan Change 29 by August 2022; and

5.    Notes notification of a potential Housing Plan Change 29 will be delayed in the interim; and

6.    Requests officers identify how Plan Change 29 can deliver to mitigation and sequestration of greenhouse gases, climate change adaptation and improvement of local environments including water conservation to an Environment and Climate Committee workshop.

Her Worship the Mayor/McGurk                                                      Carried

 

 

The meeting adjourned at 3.02p.m. reconvened at 3.10p.m. at which time Councillor Fulton left the meeting.

 

10.     Exclusion of the Public

Resolved CL/2022/076

 

That the Council

1.    Excludes the public from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting.

2.    The general subject of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter and the specific grounds under section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution are as follows:  

Courtney/Bowater                                                                         Carried

 

Item

General subject of each matter to be considered

Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter

Particular interests protected (where applicable)

1

Recommendation from Committees

 

Joint Shareholders Committee – 17 May 2022

 

Nelson Airport Director Appointments

Section 48(1)(a)

The public conduct of this matter would be likely to result in disclosure of information for which good reason exists under section 7.

The withholding of the information is necessary:

·      Section 7(2)(a)

        To protect the privacy of natural persons, including that of a deceased person

 

2

Proposal for property purchase for sea sports facility

Section 48(1)(a)

The public conduct of this matter would be likely to result in disclosure of information for which good reason exists under section 7

The withholding of the information is necessary:

·    Section 7(2)(i)

     To enable the local authority to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations)

3

Proposed Sale of part of Haven Road Property

Section 48(1)(a)

The public conduct of this matter would be likely to result in disclosure of information for which good reason exists under section 7

The withholding of the information is necessary:

·    Section 7(2)(h)

     To enable the local authority to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities

·    Section 7(2)(i)

     To enable the local authority to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations)

 

The meeting went into confidential session at 3.20p.m. and resumed in public session at 4.14p.m.

Adjournment of Meeting

Resolved CL/2022/077

 

That the Council

1.    Adjourns the meeting until Tuesday 24 May at 2.00pm via Zoom.

Edgar/Noonan                                                                               Carried

 


 

 

Minutes of a  reconvened meeting of the

Nelson City Council

Te Kaunihera o Whakatū

Held via Zoom on Tuesday 24 May 2022, commencing at 2.03p.m.

 

Present:              Her Worship the Mayor R Reese (Chairperson), Councillors Y Bowater, T Brand,  M Courtney, J Edgar (Deputy Mayor), K Fulton, M Lawrey, R O'Neill-Stevens, B McGurk, G Noonan, P Rainey, R Sanson and T Skinner

In Attendance:     Chief Executive (P Dougherty), Group Manager Infrastructure (A Louverdis), Group Manager Community Services (A White), Group Manager Corporate Services (N Harrison), Group Manager Strategy and Communications (N McDonald), Team Leader Governance (R Byrne) and Assistant Governance Adviser (A Bryce-Neumann)

Apologies :          Nil

 

11      Exclusion of the Public

Resolved CL/2022/078

 

 

That the Council

1.    Excludes the public from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting.

2.    The general subject of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter and the specific grounds under section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution are as follows:

 

Her Worship the Mayor/Bowater                                                     Carried

 

 

Item

General subject of each matter to be considered

Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter

Particular interests protected (where applicable)

 

2

Proposal for property purchase for sea sports facility

Section 48(1)(a)

The public conduct of this matter would be likely to result in disclosure of information for which good reason exists under section 7

The withholding of the information is necessary:

·    Section 7(2)(i)

     To enable the local authority to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations)

 

3

Proposed Sale of part of Haven Road Property

Section 48(1)(a)

The public conduct of this matter would be likely to result in disclosure of information for which good reason exists under section 7

The withholding of the information is necessary:

·    Section 7(2)(h)

     To enable the local authority to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities

·    Section 7(2)(i)

     To enable the local authority to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations)

 

The meeting went into confidential session at 2.05p.m. and resumed in public session at 4.36p.m.

 

12.     Restatements

 

It was resolved while the public was excluded:

1

Nelson Airport Ltd Constitution

 

1.    Agrees that the decision remain confidential at this time.

 

 

 

 

3

Options Investigation - regional visitor services

 

1.     Agrees that Report (R26834) and the decision be excluded from public release until 1 July 2022

 

 

There being no further business the meeting ended at 3.20p.m.

 

Confirmed as a correct record of proceedings by resolution on (date)

 

Resolved

 

 

     


Nelson City Council Minutes - 26 May 2022

 

 

 

Minutes of an extraordinary meeting of the

Nelson City Council

Te Kaunihera o Whakatū

Held in the via Zoom on Thursday 26 May 2022, commencing at 10.05a.m.

 

Present:              Her Worship the Mayor R Reese (Chairperson), Councillors Y Bowater, T Brand, M Courtney, J Edgar (Deputy Mayor), K Fulton, M Lawrey, R O'Neill-Stevens, B McGurk, G Noonan, P Rainey and T Skinner

In Attendance:     Team Leader Governance (R Byrne)

Apology:              An apology has been received from Councillor R Sanson

 

Karakia and Mihi Timatanga

 

1.       Apologies

Resolved CL/2022/086

 

That the Council

1.    Receives and accepts an apology from Councillor R Sanson.

Her Worship the Mayor/Courtney                                                   Carried

 

2.       Confirmation of Order of Business

There was no change to the order of business.

3.       Interests

There were no updates to the Interests Register, and no interests with items on the agenda were declared.

4.       Public Forum

There was no public forum.     

  

5.       Exclusion of the Public

Employment Consultant, Annika Streefland was in attendance for the Confidential agenda to answer questions and, accordingly, the following resolution is required to be passed:

Resolved CL/2022/087

 

That the Council

1.    Confirms, in accordance with sections 48(5) and 48(6) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987, that Annika Streefland, Consultant, remain after the public has been excluded, for the Confidential agenda as she has knowledge relating to the Chief Executive’s employment review that will assist the meeting.

2.    Excludes the public from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting.

3.    The general subject of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter and the specific grounds under section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution are as follows:  

Noonan/O'Neill-Stevens                                                                 Carried

 

Item

General subject of each matter to be considered

Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter

Particular interests protected (where applicable)

1

Mayor's Report - Chief Executive Review

Section 48(1)(a)

The public conduct of this matter would be likely to result in disclosure of information for which good reason exists under section 7

The withholding of the information is necessary:

·    Section 7(2)(a)

     To protect the privacy of natural persons, including that of a deceased person

The meeting went into confidential session at 10.07a.m. and resumed in public session at 12.05p.m.

 

6.       Restatements

 

It was resolved while the public was excluded:

 

1

Mayor's Report - Chief Executive Review

 

1.  Agrees that Report R26912), Attachments (A2895340 and A2895342) and the decision remain confidential at this time.

 

There being no further business the meeting ended at 12.05p.m.

 

Confirmed as a correct record of proceedings by resolution on (date)

 

Resolved

 

 

 

  


Nelson City Council Minutes - 7 June 2022

 

 

Minutes of a meeting of the

Nelson City Council

Te Kaunihera o Whakatū

Held in the Council Chamber, Civic House, 110 Trafalgar Street, Nelson on Tuesday 7 June 2022, commencing at 9.08a.m.

 

Present:              Her Worship the Mayor R Reese (Chairperson), Councillors Y Bowater, T Brand, M Courtney, J Edgar (Deputy Mayor), K Fulton, M Lawrey, R O'Neill-Stevens, B McGurk, G Noonan, P Rainey and T Skinner

In Attendance:     Chief Executive (P Dougherty), Team Leader Governance (R Byrne)

Apology:              An apology had been received from Councillor R Sanson

 

Karakia and Mihi Timatanga

1.       Apologies

Resolved CL/2022/091

 

That the Council

1.    Receives and accepts an apology from Councillor R Sanson.

Her Worship the Mayor/Courtney                                                   Carried

 

2.       Confirmation of Order of Business

There was no change to the Order of Business.

 

3.       Interests

There were no updates to the Interests Register, and no interests with items on the agenda were declared.

4.       Public Forum

There was no public forum.

Attendance: Councillor Skinner joined the meeting at 9.11a.m.

         

5.       Exclusion of the Public

Employment Consultant, Annika Streefland was in attendance for the Confidential agenda to answer questions and, accordingly, the following resolution is required to be passed:

Resolved CL/2022/092

 

That the Chief Executive Employment Committee

1.    Confirms, in accordance with sections 48(5) and 48(6) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987, that Annika Streefland remain after the public has been excluded, for the Confidential agenda, as he has knowledge relating to the Chief Executive’s Employment Review that will assist the meeting. 

Rainey/O'Neill-Stevens                                                                  Carried

 

 

Resolved CL/2022/093

 

That the Council

1.    Excludes the public from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting.

2.    The general subject of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter and the specific grounds under section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution are as follows:  

Rainey/O'Neill-Stevens                                                                  Carried

 

Item

General subject of each matter to be considered

Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter

Particular interests protected (where applicable)

4

Chief Executive Employment Review

Section 48(1)(a)

The public conduct of this matter would be likely to result in disclosure of information for which good reason exists under section 7

The withholding of the information is necessary:

·    Section 7(2)(a)

     To protect the privacy of natural persons, including that of a deceased person

·    Section 7(2)(i)

     To enable the local authority to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations)

The meeting went into Confidential session at 9.11a.m. and adjourned in Confidential session at 12.05p.m.

The meeting reconvened in confidential session via Zoom on Thursday 09 June 2022 at 1.08p.m. and resumed in public session at 2.27p.m.

Karakia Whakamutanga

6.       Restatements

 

It was resolved while the public was excluded:

 

1

Chief Executive Employment Review

 

2.     Confirms that the Report (HC26930) and decision remain confidential at this time.

 

There being no further business the meeting ended at 2.27p.m.

Confirmed as a correct record of proceedings by resolution on (date)

 

Resolved

 

    


Nelson City Council Minutes - 14 June 2022

 

 

Minutes of a meeting of the

Nelson City Council

Te Kaunihera o Whakatū

Held in the via Zoom on Tuesday 14 June 2022, commencing at 9.00a.m.

 

Present:              Her Worship the Mayor R Reese (Chairperson), Councillors Y Bowater, T Brand, M Courtney, J Edgar (Deputy Mayor), K Fulton, M Lawrey, R O'Neill-Stevens, B McGurk, G Noonan, P Rainey, R Sanson and T Skinner

In Attendance:     Chief Executive (P Dougherty), Group Manager Infrastructure (A Louverdis), Group Manager Environmental Management (C Barton), Group Manager Community Services (A White), Group Manager Corporate Services (N Harrison), Group Manager Strategy and Communications (N McDonald) and Team Leader Governance (R Byrne) and Assistant Governance Adviser (A Bryce-Neumann)

Apologies :          Councillor O’Neill-Stevens for lateness

 

Karakia and Mihi Timatanga

1.       Apologies

Resolved CL/2022/001

 

That the Council

1.     Receives and accepts the apology from Councillor O’Neill-Stevens for lateness.

Her Worship the Mayor/Noonan                                                      Carried

2.       Confirmation of Order of Business

Her Worship the Mayor advised that the Late Items had been removed from the Agenda and noted that Item 11: NRDA Statement of Intent  would be considered at 1.00p.m. to allow external representatives to be in attendance.

Attendance: Councillor Fulton joined the meeting at 9.10a.m.

 

3.       Interests

There were no updates to the Interests Register, and no interests with items on the agenda were declared.

4.       Public Forum

There was no public forum.

5.       Recommendations from Committees

5.1     Audit, Risk and Finance Subcommittee - 24 May 2022

5.1.1    Draft Annual Internal Audit Plan to 30 June 2023

Recommendation to Council CL/2022/098

 

That the Council

1.    Approves the Draft Annual Internal Audit Plan for the year to 30 June 2023 (A2867251).

Sanson/Edgar                                                                               Carried

 

5.2     Strategic Development and Property Subcommittee - 9 June 2022

5.2.1    Nelson Marina Masterplan

Councillor Noonan noted that some changes were made to the draft Marina Masterplan to clarify the delegations between Strategic Development and Property Subcommittee and Community and Recreation Committee regarding the Sea Sports building.

Recommendation to Council CL/2022/099

 

That the Council

1.    Approves releasing the Draft Nelson Marina Masterplan (A2893150) for consultation and community feedback; and

2.    Approves the public feedback document (A2893152).

Noonan/Edgar                                                                               Carried

 

6.       Mayor's Report

Document number R26948

Her Worship the Mayor presented her report. 

Resolved CL/2022/100

 

That the Council

1.    Receives the report Mayor's Report (R26948) and its attachment (A2898827).

Her Worship the Mayor/Courtney                                                   Carried

 

7.       Adoption of the Annual Plan 2022/23 and setting of the rates

Document number R26771, agenda pages 16 - 42 refer.

Group Manager Corporate Services, Nikki Harrison, and Group Manager Strategy and Communications, Nicky McDonald, presented the report. Ms Harrison noted an amendment to the General Rate and Uniform Annual General Charge, confirming the total amount was the same. A design copy of the Draft Annual Plan 2022/23 (A2904439) and the Mayor’s Foreword (A2905213) were tabled.

It was noted that the bike shelter behind Civic House was included in the Annual Plan, and that with the hybrid working environment and the Trafalgar St bike shelter, there should be sufficient space to provide for staff, and this should no longer be required.  

Ms Harrison and Ms McDonald and Group Manager Infrastructure, Alec Louverdis, answered questions on the reduction in UAGC, forestry overspend, carry forwards for ceiling tiles and transport and Rutherford St stormwater upgrade.

Attendance: Councillor O’Neill-Stevens joined the meeting at 9.55a.m.

The meeting adjourned from 10.09a.m. until 10.23a.m.

The motion was taken in parts. 

Resolved CL/2022/101

 

That the Council

1.    Receives the report Adoption of the Annual Plan 2022/23 and setting of the rates (R26771)  and its attachments (A2891743, A2891469, and A2900167); and

2.    Agrees that the content of the Annual Plan 2022/23 does not include significant or material differences to year two of the Long Term Plan 2021-31; and

3.    Approves the budget carry forwards as set out in Attachment 1 (A2891743); and

4.    Reconfirms, as approved through the Long Term Plan 2021-31, that setting an unbalanced budget in the Annual Plan 2022/23 is prudent in terms of section 100 of the Local Government Act 2002, given the ongoing effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the local economy and ratepayers, and having had regard to the matters in section 100(2) of the Local Government Act 2002;

5.    Adopts the Annual Plan 2022/23 (A2900167) pursuant to Section 95 of the Local Government Act 2002; and

6.    Delegates the Acting Mayor, Councillor Sanson and Acting Chief Executive to make any necessary minor editorial amendments prior to the release of the Annual Plan 2022/23 to the public; and

7.    Sets the following rates under the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002, on rating units in the district for the financial year commencing on 1 July 2022 and ending on 30 June 2023.

        The revenue approved below will be raised         by the rates and charges that follow.

  Revenue approved:

General Rate                      $46,604,098

Uniform Annual General Charge                                         $8,150,092

 

Stormwater and Flood Protection Charge                                  $8,561,516

Waste Water Charge          $10,776,338

Water Annual Charge          $4,133,539

 

                            Water Volumetric Charge                                                                                       $9,644,924

Rates and Charges (excluding GST)                                            $87,871,347

Goods and Services Tax
(at the current rate)          $13,180,702

Total Rates and Charges $101,052,049

The rates and charges below are GST inclusive.

        (1) General Rate

A general rate set under section 13 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002, assessed on a differential land value basis as described below:

·     a rate of 0.34323 cents in the dollar of land value on every rating unit in the “residential – single unit” category.

 

·     a rate of 0.34323 cents in the dollar of land value on every rating unit in the “residential empty section” category.

 

·     a rate of 0.37755 cents in the dollar of land value on every rating unit in the “single residential unit forming part of a parent valuation, the remainder of which is non-rateable” category. This represents a plus 10% differential on land value.

 

·     a rate of 0.37755 cents in the dollar of land value on every rating unit in the “multi residential” category. This represents a plus 10% differential on land value.

 

·     a rate of 1.15049 cents in the dollar of land value on every rating unit in the “commercial – excluding inner city and Stoke commercial” subject to 100% commercial and industrial (occupied and empty) category. This represents a plus 235.195% differential on land value.

 

·     a rate of 0.94869 cents in the dollar of land value on every rating unit in the “commercial – excluding inner city and Stoke commercial” subject to 25% residential and 75% commercial” category. This represents a plus 176.4% differential on land value.

 

·     a rate of 0.74687 cents in the dollar of land value on every rating unit in the “commercial – excluding inner city and Stoke commercial” subject to 50% residential and 50% commercial” category. This represents a plus 117.6% differential on land value.

 

·     a rate of 0.54505 cents in the dollar of land value on every rating unit in the “commercial – excluding inner city and Stoke commercial” subject to 75% residential and 25% commercial” category. This represents a plus 58.8% differential on land value.

 

·     a rate of 1.59411 cents in the dollar of land value on every rating unit in the “commercial inner city” subject to 100% commercial and industrial (occupied and empty) category. This represents a plus 364.445% differential on land value.

 

·     a rate of 1.28128 cents in the dollar of land value on every rating unit in the “commercial inner city subject to 25% residential and 75% commercial” category. This represents a plus 273.3% differential on land value.

 

·     a rate of 0.96860 cents in the dollar of land value on every rating unit in the “commercial inner city subject to 50% residential and 50% commercial” category. This represents a plus 182.2% differential on land value.

 

·     a rate of 0.65591 cents in the dollar of land value on every rating unit in the “commercial inner city subject to 75% residential and 25% commercial” category. This represents a plus 91.1% differential on land value.

 

·     a rate of 1.38583 cents in the dollar of land value on every rating unit in the “Stoke commercial subject to 100% commercial and industrial (occupied and empty)” category. This represents a plus 303.76% differential on land value.

 

·     a rate of 1.12511 cents in the dollar of land value on every rating unit in the “Stoke commercial subject to 25% residential and 75% commercial” category. This represents a plus 227.8% differential on land value.

 

·     a rate of 0.86460 cents in the dollar of land value on every rating unit in the “Stoke commercial subject to 50% residential and 50% commercial” category. This represents a plus 151.9% differential on land value.

 

·     a rate of 0.60374 cents in the dollar of land value on every rating unit in the “Stoke commercial subject to 75% residential and 25% commercial” category. This represents a plus 75.9% differential on land value.

 

·     a rate of 0.22310 cents in the dollar of land value on every rating unit in the “rural” category. This represents a minus 35% differential on land value.

 

·     a rate of 0.30891 cents in the dollar of land value on every rating unit in the “small holding” category. This represents a minus 10% differential on land value.

(2) Uniform Annual General Charge

A uniform annual general charge under section 15 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002 of $376.05 per separately used or inhabited part of a rating unit.

(3) Stormwater and Flood Protection Charge

A targeted rate under section 16 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002 of $454.43 per rating unit, this rate is payable by all ratepayers excluding rural rating units, rating units east of the Gentle Annie saddle, Saxton’s Island and Council’s stormwater network.

(4) Waste Water Charge

A targeted rate for waste water disposal under section 16 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002 of:

·     $564.72 per separately used or inhabited part of a residential, multi residential, rural and small holding rating units that is connected either directly or through a private drain to a public waste water drain.

 

·     For commercial rating units, a waste water charge of $141.18 per separately used or inhabited part of a rating unit that is connected either directly or through a private drain to a public waste water drain. Note:  a trade waste charge will also be levied.

(5) Water Annual Charge

A targeted rate for water supply under Section 16 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002, of:

Water charge (per connection)          $220.69

 

          (6) Water Volumetric Rate

A targeted rate for water provided under Section 19 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002, of:

Price of water:

Usage up to 10,000 cu.m/year $2.295 per m³

Usage from 10,001 – 100,000

cu.m/year                                 $1.962 per m³

Usage over 100,000 cu.m/year $1.548 per m³

Summer irrigation usage over

10,000 cu.m/year                     $2.129 per m³

 

        (7) Low Valued Properties Remission Value

In accordance Section 85 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002 and Council’s Rates Remission Policy, Council sets the land value for the Low Valued Properties Rates Remission at $10,000.

Other Rating Information:

Due Dates for Payment of Rates

The above rates (excluding water volumetric rates) shall be payable in four instalments on the following dates:

 

Instalment
Number

Instalment Date

Last Date for Payment

Penalty Applied

Instalment 1

25 July 2022

22 August 2022

26 August 2022

Instalment 2

25 October 2022

21 November 2022

25 November 2022

Instalment 3

25 January 2023

20 February 2023

24 February 2023

Instalment 4

26 April 2023

22 May 2023

26 May 2023

Rates instalments not paid on or by the Last Date for payment above will incur penalties as detailed in the section “Penalty on Rates”.

Due Dates for Payment of Water Volumetric Rates

Water volumetric rates shall be payable on the following dates:

 

Billing Month

Last Date for Payment

July 2022

22 August 2022

August 2022

20 September 2022

September 2022

20 October 2022

October 2022

21 November 2022

November 2022

20 December 2022

December 2022

20 January 2023

January 2023

20 February 2023

February 2023

20 March 2023

March 2023

20 April 2023

April 2023

22 May 2023

May 2023

20 June 2023

June 2023

20 July 2023

 

Penalty on Rates

Pursuant to Sections 57 and 58 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002, the council authorises the following penalties on unpaid rates (excluding volumetric water rate accounts) and delegates authority to the Group Manager Corporate Services to apply them:

·     a charge of 5% of the amount of each rate instalment remaining unpaid after the due date stated above, to be added on the penalty date as shown in the above table and also shown on each rate instalment notice.

 

·     a charge of 5% will be added on 8 July 2022 to any balance from a previous rating year (including penalties previously charged) remaining outstanding on 1 July 2022.

 

·     a further additional charge of 5% will be added on 11 January 2023 to any balance from a previous rating year (including penalties previously charged) to which a penalty has been added according to the bullet point above, remaining outstanding on 9 January 2023.

Penalty Remission

In accordance Section 85 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002 and Council’s Rates Remission Policy, the Council will approve the remission of a penalty where the criteria of the policy has been met.

Payment of Rates

Rates shall be payable at the Council offices, Civic House, 110 Trafalgar Street, Nelson between the hours of 8.30am to 5.00pm Monday, Tuesday, Thursday and Friday and 9.00am to 5.00pm Wednesday.

Where any payment is made by a ratepayer that is less than the amount now payable, the Council will apply the payment firstly to any rates outstanding from previous rating years and then to current year rates due.

Her Worship the Mayor/Noonan                                                      Carried

 

Attachments

1    A2905213 Mayoral Annual Plan Foreword 2022 - 13June2022

2    A2904439 Draft designed copy - Annual Plan 2022-23 - 10June2022

 

8.       Central Library Development Project Progress Report to End of March 2022 Quarter

Document number R26822, agenda pages 43 - 50 refer.

Library Redevelopment Project Manager, Alice Heather, presented the report and answered questions.

In response to a question on funding and insurance, Group Manager Corporate Services, Nikki Harrison advised that Council was expected to consider the intergenerational benefit of projects and ensure costs were shared over generations, therefore the work  would be funded in debt. She noted that there had been no future issues signalled from insurance providers. 

Group Manager Infrastructure, Alec Louverdis, answered questions on geotechnical and liquification reports.

 Resolved CL/2022/102

 

That the Council

1.    Receives the report Central Library Development         project Progress Report to End of March 2022 Quarter         (R26822).

Edgar/O'Neill-Stevens                                                                    Carried

 

9.       Central Library Development - Communications Strategy

Document number R26933, late items agenda pages 5 - 30 refer.

Library Redevelopment Project Manager, Alice Heather, and consultant, Emma Thompson from Publik, presented the report and answered questions on the consultation timeline.

The meeting adjourned from 11.25a.m until 11.38a.m.

 Resolved CL/2022/103

 

That the Council

1.    Receives the report Central Library Development - Communications Strategy (R26933) and its attachment (A2903525); and

2.    Approves the Central Library Development Communications Strategy as set out in report (R26933) and  its attachment (A2903525).

Courtney/Brand                                                                             Carried

 

The meeting adjourned at 12.10p.m. until 12.55p.m. at which time Councillors Skinner and Noonan left the meeting.

 

10.     Nelson Regional Development Agency Statement of Intent 2022/2023 (Agenda Item 11)

Document number R26709, agenda pages 62 - 121 refer.

Manager Strategy, Pip Jamieson, presented the report and noted minor editorial changes. Nelson Regional Development Agency Chair Meg Matthews, Chief Executive, Fiona Wilson and staff members Tracee Neilson and Toni Power were in attendance to answer questions.  Ms Wilson presented an overview of the Statement of Intent (tabled A2905158).

Attendance: Councillor Noonan joined the meeting at 1.05p.m. and Councillor Skinner joined the meeting at 1.19p.m.

Ms Wilson answered questions on the ISite closure, use of social media and transition of board members.

Resolved CL/2022/104

 

That the Council

1.    Receives the report Nelson Regional Development Agency Statement of Intent 2022/2023 (R26709) and its attachment (A2901525); and

2.    Agrees that the Nelson Regional Development Agency Statement of Intent 2022/23 meets Council’s expectations and is approved as the final Statement of Intent for 2022/23; and

3.     Delegates the Acting Mayor, Group Manager Strategy and Communications and Chief Executive of NRDA to make any necessary minor editorial amendments prior to the release of the Statement of Intent 2022/23.

Fulton/Courtney                                                                            Carried

 

Attachments

1    A2905158 Powerpoint Presentation NRDA

11.     Exclusion of the Public

Resolved CL/2022/105

 

That the Council

1.    Excludes the public from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting.

2.    The general subject of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter and the specific grounds under section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution are as follows:  

Edgar/Bowater                                                                              Carried

 

Item

General subject of each matter to be considered

Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter

Particular interests protected (where applicable)

4

Nelmac Limited Director Reappointment

Section 48(1)(a)

The public conduct of this matter would be likely to result in disclosure of information for which good reason exists under section 7

The withholding of the information is necessary:

·    Section 7(2)(a)

     To protect the privacy of natural persons, including that of a deceased person

5

Confidential Attachment to Report R26950: Supplementary information - Holding Company decision

Section 48(1)(a)

The public conduct of this matter would be likely to result in disclosure of information for which good reason exists under section 7

The withholding of the information is necessary:

·    Section 7(2)(h)

     To enable the local authority to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities

 

Recommendations from Committees

 

 

6

Strategic Development and Property Subcommittee - 9 June 2022

Relocatable Home Park Maitai Valley Motor Camp Approval

Section 48(1)(a)

The public conduct of this matter would be likely to result in disclosure of information for which good reason exists under section 7

The withholding of the information is necessary:

·    Section 7(2)(a)

     To protect the privacy of natural persons, including that of a deceased person

·    Section 7(2)(g)

     To maintain legal professional privilege

The meeting went into confidential session at 2.00p.m. and resumed in public session at 3.49p.m.

12.     Quarterly update on significant central government reform programmes

Document number R26888, agenda pages 51 - 61 refer.

Policy Adviser, Ailish Neyland presented the report. Group Manager Infrastructure, Alec Louverdis updated that submissions for 3 Waters closed on 22 July, Council would be providing a range of options to gather views of the community to inform Council’s submission. Residents could also submit directly to the Select Committee. 

Resolved CL/2022/106

 

That the Council

1.    Receives the report Quarterly update on significant central government reform programmes (R26888)

Her Worship the Mayor/Noonan                                                      Carried

 

13.     Late Item: Supplementary information - Holding Company decision

Document number R26950, late items agenda pages 31 - 102 refer.

The Chief Executive removed this item from the Agenda.

 

Karakia Whakamutanga

 

14.     Restatements

 

It was resolved while the public was excluded:

1

Recommendation from Committee:

Relocatable Home Park Maitai Valley Motor Camp Approval

 

Agrees that the decision, report (R26783) and attachment (A2885934) remain confidential at this time.

 

 

2

Nelmac Limited Director Reappointment

 

Agrees that the decisions only be made publicly available once the 2022 Nelmac Limited Annual General Meeting has taken place

 

There being no further business the meeting ended at 4.11p.m..

 

Confirmed as a correct record of proceedings by resolution on (date)

 

Resolved

 

 

     


Nelson City Council Minutes - 23 June 2022

 

 

 

Minutes of a meeting of the

Nelson City Council

Te Kaunihera o Whakatū

Held in the via Zoom on Thursday 23 June 2022, commencing at 9.00a.m.

 

Present:              Acting Mayor J Edgar (Chairperson), Councillors Y Bowater, T Brand, M Courtney, R O'Neill-Stevens, B McGurk, G Noonan, P Rainey, R Sanson and T Skinner

In Attendance:     Group Manager Strategy and Communications (N McDonald) Team Leader Governance (R Byrne) and Governance Adviser (T Kruger)

Apologies:           Apologies have been received from Councillors K Fulton and M Lawrey  

Leave of Absence:Her Worship the Mayor Reese

 

Karakia and Mihi Timatanga

1.       Apologies

Resolved CL/2022/105

 

That the Council

1.    Receives and accepts the apologies from Councillor K Fulton and Councillor M Lawrey.

Edgar/McGurk                                                                               Carried

 

2.       Confirmation of Order of Business

There was no change to the Order of Business.

 

3.       Interests

There were no updates to the Interests Register, and no interests with items on the agenda were declared.

4.       Public Forum

There was no public forum.

5.       Acting Mayor's Report

Document number R26981

There was no Acting Mayor’s report.

 

6.       Draft Arts and Creativity Strategy

Document number R26803, agenda pages 5 - 157 refer.

Policy Adviser, Ailish Neyland, presented the report and noted that the reference number on the footer of the feedback document was incorrect, however Recommendation 2 recorded the correct reference number.

Consultants Johnny O’Donnell, Ali Boswijk and Chris Ward were in attendance to present the Draft Arts and Creativity Strategy, which they had prepared for Council.  They provided an overview of the extensive engagement they had managed prior to producing the Draft Strategy, noting that the process of developing the strategy had helped build relationships and had already activated new ideas.     

The Consultants answered questions on engagement with Marlborough and Tasman District councils and confirmed that the intention was to create a regional approach.  

Attendance: Councillor Courtney entered the meeting at 9.34am.

Resolved CL/2022/106

 

That the Council

1.    Receives the report Draft Arts and Creativity Strategy  (R26803) and its attachments (A2908039, A2907758 and A2907761); and

2.    Approves the Draft Arts and Creativity Strategy public feedback document (A2908039) for public feedback; and

3.    Agrees that the public feedback document (A2908039) meets the requirements of the Local Government Act 2002 including the principles of consultation in section 82; and

4.    Approves the consultation approach (set out in paragraphs 7.1 and 7.2 of this report (R26803) and agrees:

a.     the approach includes sufficient steps to ensure the Draft Arts and Creativity Strategy will be reasonably accessible to the public and will be publicised in a manner appropriate to its purpose and significance; and

b.    the approach will result in the Draft Arts and Creativity Strategy being as widely publicised as reasonably practicable as a basis for consultation; and

5.    Agrees that the Arts Strategy Working Group Chair and the Group Manager Strategy and Communications be delegated to approve any minor amendments required to the supporting information or public feedback materials prior to the start of the engagement process.

Edgar/Rainey                                                                                Carried

      

Karakia Whakamutanga

 There being no further business the meeting ended at 9.53a.m.

 

Confirmed as a correct record of proceedings by resolution on (date)

 

Resolved

 

 

    


Item 7: Status Report: Attachment 1

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

Item 8: Acting Mayor's Report

 

Council

12 July 2022

 

 

REPORT R26978

Acting Mayor's Report

 

1.       Purpose of Report

1.1       To update members on current matters.

2.       Recommendation

 

That the Council

1.    Receives the report Acting Mayor's Report (R26978) and its attachment (A2909891 and A2913709); and

2.    Supports the proposed Remits to the Local Government New Zealand AGM 2022, as discussed:

a.     Remit 1 – support/not support

b.    Remit 2 - support/not support

c.     Remit 3 - support/not support

d.    Remit 4 - support/not support

e.     Remit 5 - support/not support

f.     Remit 6 - support/not support

3.    Approves, Council’s submission to the Electoral (Māori Electoral Option) Legislation Bill.

 

 

3.       Discussion

Local Government New Zealand AGM – Remits

3.1       The 2022 LGNZ Annual General Meeting (AGM) Remits are attached (A2909891). Remits are sent out as part of the AGM Business Papers prior to the AGM to allow members sufficient time to review and discuss. 

3.2       There are a 6 Remits to be considered at the AGM:

3.2.1    Remit 1 - Central Government funding for public transport

3.2.2    Remit 2 - Review of Government transport funding

3.2.3    Remit 3 - Illegal street racing

3.2.4    Remit 4 - Bylaw infringements

3.2.5    Remit 5 - Density and proximity of vaping retailers

3.2.6    Remit 6 - Polling LGNZ Members

Climatorium

3.3       Whakatū Inc would like to invite elected members to a stakeholder update function to provide an update on the Climatorium business case.

3.4       The Mayor’s office have advised available dates and staff are currently waiting to hear back from Whakatū Inc as to which date will be suitable.

Electoral (Māori Electoral Option) Legislation Bill

3.5       In late June, Council was advised that submissions had opened for the Electoral (Māori Electoral Option) Legislation Bill. The closing date for submissions is 30 July 2022.

3.6       Nelson City Council has advocated in 2021 to the Electoral Commission and submitted to the Minister and Ministry of Justice in relation to the timing of the Māori Electoral Option – the current Electoral Act provides for electors to choose to move to the Māori roll only within a three to four month period every five years.

3.7       It is proposed to lodge a specific submission in support of the proposed changes within the Bill, which will provide continuous opportunity for electors to enrol on the electoral roll of their choice and improve parity between general and Māori electors. A draft submission is attached for approval (A2913709), noting that the addressee information will be added once a lead department has been advised. 

Author:          Judene Edgar, Acting Mayor

Attachments

Attachment 1:   A2909891 LGNZ AGM Remits 2022

Attachment 2:   A2913709 Draft Submission to the Electoral (Maori Electoral Option) Legislation Bill   


Item 8: Acting Mayor's Report: Attachment 1

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Item 8: Acting Mayor's Report: Attachment 2

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

Item 9: Supplementary information - Holding Company decision

 

Council

12 July 2022

 

 

REPORT R26983

Supplementary information - Holding Company decision

 

1.       Purpose of Report

1.1       To consider recommendations from the 7 June 2022 Joint Shareholders Committee.

1.2       To provide additional information to the Joint Shareholders Committee report and attachments to assist with decision making.

1.3       To provide updated legal signoff, constitution, shareholders agreement and summary of constitution as requested at the Joint Shareholders Committee.

2.       Recommendation

 

That the Council

1.    Receives the report Supplementary information - Holding Company decision (R26983) and its attachments (A2907846 DLA Piper signoff incl 7 June JSC changes to constitution and SHA, and A2904604 Summary of constitution - changes incl 7 Jun JSC).

Recommendation from the Joint Shareholders Committee

The Council notes that:

Purpose

A.    The purpose of these resolutions is to seek the Council’s approval of the documents and transactions necessary to approve the:

a)    Restructuring Proposals (including the Initial Share Issue); and

b)    Financing Proposals (including the New Share Issue). 

B.    The Restructuring Proposals, Initial Share Issue, Financing Proposals and New Share Issue are explained below.

A new holding company for Port Nelson Limited and Nelson Airport Limited

C.    Nelson City Council and Tasman District Council (together, the Shareholders) have together been investigating the incorporation of a holding company which they will own in equal shares. The holding company will hold and administer investments in entities in which the Shareholders have a substantial interest for the benefit of the Nelson and Tasman regions, being Port Nelson Limited (PNL) and Nelson Airport Limited (NAL). 

D.    Nelson City Council and Tasman District Council through their Long Term Plan process and Joint Shareholders Committee (JSC), have each received and reviewed advice from Deloitte about operational synergies of holding investments, being PNL and NAL, in a holding company, and tax structure options.

E.    The name agreed for the holding company is Infrastructure Holdings Limited (IHL).

F.     The initial directors approved for IHL are Catherine Taylor, Paul Steere, Gerrard Wilson and Paul Zealand and an independent chairperson is being recruited.

Restructuring Proposals

G.    As part of the proposal to incorporate IHL, it is proposed that each of the Shareholders transfer all their shares in PNL and NAL to IHL (Share Sale) for $8,446,000 in total (Purchase Price). The Purchase Price will be owed to the Shareholders in equal portions (being $4,223,000 each). The Crown holds, and will continue to hold, one special “Kiwi Share” in NAL.

H.    The Purchase Price allocation is:

a)    $2,400,000 for the shares in NAL; and

b)    $6,046,000 for the shares in PNL.

I.     Nelson City Council and Tasman District Council will each subscribe for 42,230 ordinary shares in IHL (being 84,460 ordinary shares in total) (Initial Shares), at an issue price of $100.00 per share (Initial Share Issue). The total subscription amount for the Initial Shares is therefore $8,446,000 (Initial Subscription Amount), which is equal to the Purchase Price. 

J.     Accordingly, the Purchase Price will be satisfied on a cashless basis by set-off against the Initial Subscription Amount.

K.    The sale of shares in PNL and NAL and the subscription for the Initial Shares will be referred to in these resolutions as the “Restructuring Proposals”.

Financing Proposals

L.     The New Zealand Local Government Funding Agency Limited (LGFA) is a limited liability company owned by central government and local authorities. It was established to borrow funds and then on-lend those funds to local authorities and (now) council-controlled trading organisations (CCTOs) at lower margins than those local authorities and council-controlled organisations would otherwise pay. 

M.    Currently, PNL and NAL service their debt requirements through ordinary bank borrowing from Westpac New Zealand Limited (Westpac). However, it is projected that PNL’s and NAL’s debt requirements and financing costs may increase over the next 10+ years to meet infrastructure-upgrade demands.

N.    Given the projected increase in PNL’s and NAL’s debt requirements and financing costs, IHL’s primary purpose is to operate as a treasury vehicle for PNL and NAL. To achieve this purpose, it is further proposed that (Financing Proposals) IHL will:

a)    join the LGFA borrowing programme (LGFA Accession) as a CCTO, following which, IHL will be able to borrow funds directly from LGFA by issuing securities to LGFA;

b)    enter into borrowing and risk hedging facilities with Westpac, which is PNL’s and NAL’s current bank; and

c)    on-lend amounts borrowed from the LGFA borrowing programme and Westpac to PNL and NAL under intra-group funding arrangements.

O.    Joining the LGFA borrowing programme will enable IHL to access cheaper core debt on behalf of PNL and NAL. As a “port company” under the Port Companies Act 1988, PNL is not permitted to join LGFA and NAL does not have the scale to make joining LGFA economical.  It is considered that, once implemented, the Financing Proposals will deliver considerable financial benefits, including savings in financing costs for PNL and NAL and, consequently, increased dividend return to Nelson City Council and Tasman District Council (as the ultimate owners of PNL and NAL). Nelson City Council and Tasman District Council through their Long Term Plan process and the JSC have each received and reviewed advice from Deloitte about LGFA funding benefits.

P.    PNL and NAL will continue to require the flexibility offered by Westpac’s transactional banking products. IHL will also enter into borrowing and risk hedging facilities with Westpac for working capital requirements and risk-management (such as interest-rate hedging).

The LGFA Accession and Westpac facilities

Q.    LGFA and Westpac will require certain credit support as conditions to the LGFA Accession and the availability of the Westpac facilities. Such credit support will include:

a)    a subscription from the Shareholders for an agreed amount of uncalled and unpaid equity capital in IHL (further details are described below);

b)    IHL, PNL and NAL will each cross-guarantee each other’s obligations to LGFA, Westpac as lender under borrowing facilities and Westpac as counter-party to risk-management facilities (together, the Finance Parties); and

c)    IHL, PNL and NAL will each grant general security over all of their personal property in favour of the Finance Parties.  In the case of IHL, this will include security over its right to call for uncalled and unpaid equity capital.

R.    As mentioned above, it will be a condition to the LGFA Accession and the availability of the Westpac facilities that the Shareholders subscribe for, and IHL issues to the Shareholders (New Share Issue), a further 1,165,000 ordinary shares each (totalling 2,330,000 ordinary shares) in IHL (New Shares) for an issue price of $100.00 per share. The total amount payable for the New Shares will therefore be $233,000,000 (Issue Amount). The Issue Amount will remain uncalled and unpaid until such time as the directors of IHL make a call on the New Shares for the Issue Amount. 

Shareholder approvals

S.    The Restructuring Proposals and the Financing Proposals will require the approval of the Shareholders as:

a)    the proposals are, or may be, “major transactions” (as defined in section 129 of the Companies Act 1993 (Act));

b)    the Initial Share Issue and the New Share Issue require the agreement of IHL’s entitled persons (as that term is defined in the Act) for the purposes of section 107(2) of the Act. The only entitled persons of IHL will be the Shareholders; and

c)    Nelson City Council and Tasman District Council (as the shareholders of IHL) must consent, for the purposes of section 50 of the Act and for all other purposes, to becoming the holder of the Initial Shares and the New Shares.

T.    Accordingly, IHL’s board of directors will, at the relevant times, separately request that Tasman District Council and Nelson City Council (as shareholders and entitled persons of IHL) confirm and approve IHL’s entry into, execution and performance, of the:

a)    Restructuring Proposals (including the Initial Share Issue); and

b)    Financing Proposals (including the New Share Issue),

by separate unanimous resolutions and entitled persons’ agreements.  The unanimous resolutions and entitled persons’ agreements for the Restructuring Proposals and the Financing Proposals are together referred to as the “Unanimous Shareholder Resolutions and Entitled Persons’ Agreements”.

Next steps

U.    In order to incorporate IHL and give effect to the Restructuring Proposals, the Shareholders will need to:

a)     register IHL as a limited liability company on the New Zealand Companies Office and each complete the Companies Office requirements in relation to the incorporation of IHL (such as shareholder consent forms) (Companies Office Forms);

b)     appoint directors to the board of IHL (including an independent chairperson);

c)     cause IHL to adopt the constitution in the form attached (the Constitution);

d)     enter into a shareholders’ agreement (which will include the subscription provisions for the Initial Shares) with IHL, in the form attached (the Shareholders’ Agreement);

e)     enter into a sale and purchase agreement with IHL relating to the transfer of shares in PNL and NAL in the form attached (the Sale and Purchase Agreement);

f)     execute and deliver the share transfer forms (in the form attached) in relation to the Sale and Purchase Agreement (the Share Transfer Forms); and

g)     any other documents necessary or desirable in connection with the Restructuring Proposals.

The Companies Office Forms, Shareholders’ Agreement, Sale and Purchase Agreement, Share Transfer Forms and any other documents captured by paragraph U.g) above, are together referred to as the “Restructuring Documents”, and the transactions contemplated by the Restructuring Documents are referred to as the “Restructuring Transactions”.

V.    In order to give effect to the Financing Proposals, each of the Shareholders will need to enter into:

a)     a subscription agreement (in the form attached) with IHL, under which the Shareholders will subscribe for the New Shares (Subscription Agreement);

b)     (as part of the LGFA Accession) accession deeds to the multi-issuer deed and notes subscription agreement (which Tasman District Council and Nelson City Council are each already a party to) (Accession Deeds); and

c)     any other documents necessary or desirable in connection with the Financing Proposals.

The Subscription Agreement, the Accession Deeds and any other documents captured by paragraph 0 are together referred to as the “Financing Documents” and the transactions contemplated by the Financing Documents are referred to as the “Financing Transactions”.

Documents

W.   The Council tables the most recent drafts of the Restructuring Documents, the Subscription Agreement and the Unanimous Shareholder Resolutions and Entitled Persons’ Agreements.

X.    The Council has not tabled copies of the Accession Deeds because they are not yet available for the Council to review and approve.  However, the Accession Deeds will be based on the standard form for accession deeds scheduled to the LGFA Multi-Issuer Deed and Notes Subscription Agreement respectively.

That the Council resolves:

1.    the Council consents, for the purposes of section 50 of the Act and for all other purposes, to being the joint owner in equal shares of the Initial Shares and the New Shares;

2.    the form of the Constitution be approved, and the Shareholders will cause IHL to adopt the Constitution;

3.    the Restructuring Documents and the Restructuring Transactions (including, specifically, the Initial Share Issue) are approved, and any pre-emptive rights available to the Shareholders in relation to the Share Sale are to be waived in the Sale and Purchase Agreement;

4.    the Financing Documents and the Financing Transactions (including, specifically, the New Share Issue) are approved;

5.    the forms of the Unanimous Shareholder Resolutions and Entitled Persons’ Agreements are approved;

6.    the Council enters into and, following execution, delivers and performs its obligations under, each of the Restructuring Documents and the Financing Documents and that these documents may be executed by:

a)    (in the case of agreements) the Chief Executive; and

b)    (in the case of deeds) two elected members,

on behalf of the Council, subject to any minor amendments cleared by both Tasman District Council’s and Nelson City Council’s legal advisors;

7.    when requested to do so by the board of IHL, the Chief Executive is authorised to sign the Unanimous Shareholder Resolutions and Entitled Persons’ Agreements on behalf of the Council, subject to any minor amendments cleared by both TDC’s and NCC’s legal advisors;

8.    the Chief Executive is authorised on behalf of the Council to, subject to clearance by both Tasman District Council’s and Nelson City Council’s legal advisors:

a)    approve any further minor amendments to the Restructuring Documents, the Financing Documents and the Unanimous Shareholder Resolutions and Entitled Persons’ Agreements prior to their execution; ands

b)    enter into, execute, and deliver such other agreements, instruments, notices, communications, and other documents; and

c)    do such other things, in connection with the Restructuring Documents and the Restructuring Transactions, the Financing Documents and the Financing Transactions, and the Unanimous Shareholder Resolutions and Entitled Persons’ Agreements, as the Chief Executive may consider necessary.

 

 

3.       Background

3.1       The Tasman District Council and the Nelson City Council resolved to form a holding company for their investment in Port Nelson Limited and Nelson Airport Limited.  This was consulted on and agreed as part of their respective 2021-2031 Long Term Plans.  The role of the holding company is primarily as a funding vehicle for the port and airport companies. 

3.2       This matter has been considered at the Joint Shareholders Committee meetings on 15 February 2022 (Principles document), 5 April 2022 (Constitution and Shareholders Agreement) and 7 June 2022 (Constitution, Shareholders Agreement, restructuring and financing arrangements documentation).  It has also been considered at a Joint Confidential briefing on 2 May 2022 (restructuring and financing arrangements) and a NCC Confidential briefing on 12 May 2022 (constitution and Shareholders Agreement). A NCC workshop was also held on 28 June 2022.

3.3       There were a number of questions raised both prior and at the 7 June 2022 JSC and it is useful to include some of the matters to assist with decision making.

4.       Additional information

Constitution and Shareholders Agreement

4.1       The updated documents are attached to this report with only mark-ups from the versions presented to the 7 June Joint Shareholders Committee (Attachment 1 and 2). These include:

4.1.1    the removal of reference to the Joint Shareholders Committee from the constitution due to this creating confusion with reference to unanimous agreement of the shareholders;

4.1.2    adding the following Principle to the Infrastructure Holdings Limited constitution: “The primary objective of the Holding Company is to provide a funding vehicle to enable the reduction in finance costs and increase shareholder returns from Port Nelson Ltd and Nelson Airport Ltd”; and

4.1.3    formatting/tidy ups/consistency of timeframes

4.2       Section 5 of the constitution provides for the first right of refusal for the purchase of shares and approval of the other shareholder is required to transfer the shares to a third party. These clauses strengthen the current situation, where one shareholder could sell their shareholding in either the Port or Airport without reference to the other shareholder.

4.3       DLA Piper have reviewed these changes and provided signoff including that the constitution and shareholders agreement are consistent with what was consulted on through the Long Term Plan 2021-31.

Financial benefits

4.4       The Infrastructure Holdings Limited ongoing costs are estimated at $158,000 in 2022/23 and has been assumed to increase by the Consumer Price Index (CPI).  The setup costs, estimated to be up to $350,000 will likely be funded from the dividend stream, either in year 1 or spread forward to year 1 and 2 but this is a decision for the Infrastructure Holdings Limited Board. However, this would not reduce the current estimated dividends, rather it would reduce the additional dividends anticipated as a result of the interest savings

4.5       The total uninflated savings (over and above any additional costs) range from $822,000 per annum in the first year through to just under $2 million per annum in 2032. This is considered a substantial savings by the companies compared with other projects.

4.6       The increase in savings reflects the projected increase in debt within the Group from $115 million to $200 million in year 10.  Material projects include the Science and Technology Precinct, crane and wharf replacements for Port Nelson Limited. Also apron resurfacing/reconfiguration and a placeholder in year 5-8 for the Nelson Airport Limited runway extension.  The specific projects will flow through the IHL Statement of Intent.

           LGFA borrowings

4.7       The ability to access funding through the Local Government Funding Agency allows the Port and Airport to diversify funding sources by accessing not just short-term bank funding. It allows the Group to spread and smooth the funding risk and borrow for longer periods of up to 10 years compared with relatively short-term bank facilities. Lengthening the funding profile is more appropriate for infrastructure businesses which are investing in long term strategic assets

4.8       The borrowings from the LGFA will be managed by the IHL treasury function by participating in the LGFA six-weekly tenders and will primarily be for new and refinancing core debt while day to day working capital needs will be provided by Westpac. This borrowing is not on a project by project basis (similar to most bank lending) and therefore there are no specific climate change financial risk analysis on the borrowing (See also 4.17)

           Uncalled capital

4.9       The uncalled capital facility (UCF) in Infrastructure Holdings Ltd is treated as a contingent liability in both Councils’ notes to the accounts in the Annual Reports. It is not recorded on the Council’s balance sheets and does not impact the ability of either Council to borrow.  Because the Port and Airport are considered strategic assets for both Councils’ (and the region), the debt levels are already considered when Standard and Poor’s arrive at the councils’ credit rating (because the Councils’ would not let either entity fail to meet their financial obligations), therefore this proposal is seen as formalising the current arrangements.

4.10     Looking forward to June 2026, PwC have assessed a debt level of $146m.  This would comprise $100m of core debt (LGFA) and $46m of working capital and liquidity (Multiple Option Credit Line - Westpac). Actual debt levels will vary between July 2022 and June 2026 based on the Group’s operational requirements but are relatively stable over this period. 

4.11     The UCF is not an authorisation of Group debt levels.  Group debt levels are controlled and approved through the Infrastructure Holdings Ltd Statement of Intent approval process and through the groups 10-year business planning process. 

4.12     The likelihood of a call on the shares is considered remote and would mean the Group has got into significant financial difficulty as a whole. If that occurred, Council would have had warning and so would be able to take corrective actions. Both the holding company and the subsidiaries have professional boards. These boards have fiduciary and oversight obligations to shareholders and are required to act as soon as a risk arose.

4.13     It needs to be clarified that if there was an event of default the creditors would only be able to recover via the UCF the amount of debt in default – not the whole facility.  Given the debt tranches are likely to be spread over a range of maturity dates (likely out to 10 years) the amount at risk is considered low (and only liable for a 50% share).

4.14     The Local Government Act prohibits local authorities from guaranteeing the obligations of council-controlled trading organisations (such as Infrastructure Holdings Ltd).  Advice from Simpson Grierson confirms that the proposed uncalled capital facility as required as a condition to joining LGFA’s debt programme, is not a prohibited guarantee under section 62 of the Local Government Act 2022 and no issues have been raised by the Auditor-General about similar uncalled capital structures implemented by other local authorities (Section 44).

           Other Statement of Intent improvements

4.15     Joint Shareholders Committee members suggested improvements to the Statements of Intent for IHL going forward.  These would need to be signalled and agreed through the Statement of Expectation process considered in November each year via the Joint Committee of both councils.

4.15.1  Strengthen the no surprises expectations and materiality/ significance thresholds;

4.15.2  Consider an interest coverage ratio as one of the performance measures although the financial covenants with the lenders have not yet been agreed and would be key monitoring measures for the shareholder to include;

4.15.3  Inclusion of projected capital programs for the Group for up to 10 years;

4.15.4  Inclusion of the Pitt and Moore table as part of the SOI of IHL.

           Other matters

4.16     Questions were raised at the Joint Shareholders Committee meeting on 7 June 2022 and the NCC workshop on 28 June 2022 in relation to Port Nelson Limited. Information has been received from the Port Nelson Limited CEO in relation to these matters and this will be considered in Confidential session.

4.17     Director’s remuneration – for IHL this will require modifications to the Joint NCC/TDC directors remuneration policy.  It is likely that the roles on the IHL fulfilled by Board Chairs of the subsidiaries would not be remunerated by IHL.

4.18     Climate risk – although LGFA do not assess climate related risk at a project level (given the way that funds are drawn down) there are multiple ways that the Councils and the IHL group can consider this risk at a project level.  The subsidiary and IHL boards will need to consider at a project level when assessing business cases financial/economic and environmental viability.  The longer term capital program included in the SOI will flag to the shareholders projects of concern.  And major transactions will need to be approved by the shareholders.

4.19     Changes to the subsidiaries constitution – would be generally approved by the IHL board but any changes impacting the shares would need to be approved by the shareholding Councils.

4.20     Reporting from IHL and the subsidiaries – the subsidiaries will continue to present the strategic presentations to the Joint Committee of both councils twice yearly along with IHL Board representatives in March and November. IHL will also present the draft Group Statement of Intent each year.

4.21     Interested directors can vote – the constitution allows interested directors to vote. The Board won’t be involved with day to day treasury management, ie drawing down funds required to meet the agreed capital programs of the Port and Airport – the drawdowns from the bank (for working capital) or LGFA will be for both entities together as that is the most efficient way to undertake the borrowings. The Boards key oversight is in forming up the consolidated SOI for the Group and accepting the underlying capital programs of the subsidiaries (as a prudent lender they will need to be satisfied that the funding of the capital program does not put the shadow credit rating at risk or any of the bank/LGFA covenants).  The directors have to act in the best interests of the shareholders. Quarterly treasury reporting to the Board will also form part of the oversight - monitoring the treasury positions both from a debt perspective and interest rate risk management (swaps). The subsidiaries have conflicts of interest policies and interest registers and these will be put in place for IHL.

4.22     Risks – in the original business case presented to the Council in December 2020, a number of risks were identified with the option selected (consistent with the preferred option but with lower risk). 

4.22.1  Potential for the identified efficiencies and synergies to flow to the carrier through reduced landing charges – ongoing risk to be managed.

4.22.2  CAA Accreditation – the Airport don’t see this as an issue with the proposed ‘funding vehicle only’ model.

4.22.3  Pre-emptive rights under the MoT kiwi-share - this risk was subsequently raised with legal advisors who considered this not to be an issue.

4.22.4  NAL leased land – this risk was subsequently raised with legal advisors who considered this not to be an issue.

4.23     Below is an updated table of the Board appointment process.

           

5.       Next steps

5.1       Ongoing negotiations with LGFA and the bank

5.2       Signing documentation approved at today’s meeting when appropriate

5.3       Meeting between the council’s to discuss SOI improvements

 

5.4      

 

Author:          Nikki Harrison, Group Manager Corporate Services

Attachments

Attachment 1:   A2907846 - DLA Piper signoff of constitution and SHA changes since 7 June JSC

Attachment 2:   A2904604 - Summary of constitution - changes incl 7 Jun JSC   


Item 9: Supplementary information - Holding Company decision: Attachment 1 A2907846

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Item 9: Supplementary information - Holding Company decision: Attachment 2 A2904604

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

Item 10: Water Services Entities Bill Submission

 

Council

12 July 2022

 

 

REPORT R27006

Water Services Entities Bill Submission

 

 

1.       Purpose of Report

1.1       To provide an update on the Government Three Waters reforms program and the engagement process that Council has undertaken.

1.2       To consider the feedback received from the public and to approve the Council submission on the Water Services Entities Bill to the Finance and Expenditure Select Committee.

2.       Summary

2.1       The Government Three Waters reform has progressed with the Water Services Entities Bill now before the Finance and Expenditure Select Committee with submissions due by 22 July 2022.

2.2       Council has undertaken engagement to hear from the community in relation to the Bill and has taken that feedback into consideration in the preparation of the draft Council submission.

3.       Recommendation

 

That the Council

1.    Receives the report Water Services Entities Bill Submission (R27006); and the Engagement Summary (A2919612) and Complete Feedback (A2919617) and

2.    Approves the draft Council submission (A2918988) to the Finance and Expenditure Select Committee on the Water Services Entities Bill; and

3.    Agrees that the Mayor, Infrastructure Committee Chair and Chief Executive be delegated authority to approve minor editorial amendments to the Council submission (A2918988).

 

 

4.       Background

The Three Waters Reform

4.1       Over the past five years Central and Local government have been considering issues and opportunities facing the system for regulating and managing Three waters (drinking water, wastewater, and stormwater). The Government initially presented councils with a reform proposal that outlined why Government believes change is needed. The proposal also outlined the impact at the local level for each council.

4.2       Council agreed to participate in the initial stage of the three waters reforms in August 2020. This enabled Council to be part of the discussions on the reforms. On 13 August 2020 Council authorised the Mayor and Chief Executive to sign the Memorandum of Understanding and Funding Agreement for the Three Waters Program Investment Package. Staff understand there are 21 other councils who signed this Memorandum of Understanding. It noted that participation in that initial stage was undertaken in good faith, but was a non-binding approach, and that Council could opt out of the reform process at the end of the term of the agreement.

4.3       As part of Council response to Three Waters Reform, on 8 April 2021 the Infrastructure Committee approved retrospectively the Council submission to the Health Select Committee on the Water Services Bill.

4.4       Council was asked to provide a range of information related to its three water assets through a Request for Information process. This information was used by the Department for Internal Affairs to consider a range of scenarios for three waters reform. This formed the basis of the “national case for change” that supports the current proposal.

4.5       This information from Central Government on the “national case for change” includes a model developed by the Water Industry Commission for Scotland (WICS) which was based on benefits that have occurred in Scotland following its reforms.

4.6       In July 2021, the Government stated that the Three Waters Reforms would be mandated.

4.7       On 23 September 2021, Council passed a number of resolutions relating to the Three Waters Reforms.

This included a resolution that the Chief Executive would report back once staff had received further information and guidance from the Government on the next steps of the reform program and how they could be managed (23 September Council Agenda, page 174). Council resolved:

Notes that Council would need to gain an understanding of the community’s views once Council has further information from the Government on the next steps in the reform process

Could also approved a letter be sent to the Government outlining feedback on the proposed Three Waters Reform program, and noting areas where Council sought further guidance.

4.8       In October 2021, the water services regulator Taumata Arowai was established. Taumata Arowai will enforce existing standards to ensure drinking water suppliers provide safe drinking water to consumers, with significant penalties, including fines and criminal proceedings, if suppliers do not comply.

4.9       On 27 October 2021 Central Government announced the next steps for the Three Waters Reform program, including the structure of four water service entities to manage New Zealand’s drinking water, wastewater, and stormwater networks, and mandating the “all in approach”.

4.10     On 10 November 2021, the Government announced the establishment of a Working Group made up of representatives from local government and iwi/Māori to consider how representation, governance and accountability for the new water services entities could be strengthened.

4.11     On 9 December 2021 Council approved the draft submission to the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment on the Economic Regulation and Consumer Protection for Three Water Services in New Zealand. It also resolved that:

4.        Notes the Government will introduce legislation to Parliament where Council and the public will have the opportunity to submit on the Water Services Entities Bill and subsequently the Water Services Entities (Implementation Bill); and

5.     Agrees to community engagement to be undertaken prior to Council -  submitting on the draft legislation as detailed in Report R26389; and

6.     Notes a submission on the Water Services Entities Bill will be prepared once the Bill is introduced to Parliament and will be brought back to Council for approval including community feedback; and

           7.     Notes that the Chief Executive will report back once staff have received further information and guidance from the Government on the next steps and how these should be managed.

4.12     The recommendations from the Working Group were provided to the Government in March 2022. In April, Central Government announced it would adopt the majority of the recommendations provided to it by the working group.

           Better Off funding package

4.13     The Government has provided a Better Off funding package to local authorities in recognition of the significance to the local government sector, and the communities they serve, of the transfer of responsibility for water services delivery. This funding is not to be regarded as payment for the sale of assets.

4.14     The $2 billion package is pre-allocated to councils based on a nationally consistent formula and is available in two tranches. The first $500 million was made available on 1 July 2022 and the remaining $1.5 billion will be available from 1 July 2024. Councils’ unspent funds not accessed in Tranche 1 can be carried forward to Tranche 2 in July 2024.

4.15     Council has access to $5.18 million in the first tranche and is currently developing a funding proposal which demonstrates engagement with iwi/Māori, outlines how the projects meet the funding criteria, and a wellbeing assessment setting out expected outcomes. The Funding Proposal does not limit the number of projects, but all the projects must be included in one proposal.

4.16     In order to obtain the funding the Council will be required to sign a Funding Agreement with the Department of Internal Affairs (DIA). Concerns have been raised by some councils and by the Taxpayers Union that clause 2.10 of the proposed Funding Agreement is an inappropriate “Gag Clause”. The Clause reads:

        2.10. “The Recipient must not at any time do anything that could reasonably be expected to have an adverse effect on the reputation, good standing or goodwill of the DIA or the New Zealand Government.The Recipient must keep the DIA informed of any such matter known to the Recipient which could reasonably expected to have such an effect”

4.17     Guidance provided by Taituarā to councils is that the Funding Agreement would not generally restrict councils from publicly opposing or criticising the Three Waters Reform. It notes that:

The clause that seems of most concern is clause 2.10 of Part 2. This is the clause intended to protect the “reputation, good standing or goodwill” of DIA and the Government. There would be a high bar to demonstrating that a particular act created damage to the reputation, good standing or goodwill of DIA or the Government”

4.18     The Three Waters Reform National Transition Unit has also provided advice:

“Freedom to express views on the reforms:

We acknowlegde the importance of councils being able to independently express their views of the reform program. The Funding Agreement for the better off package does not preclude councils from doing this (1).

(1)     For the avoidance of doubt publicly criticising or expressions of opinions on the reform would not represent a breach of the funding agreement”

4.19     This is a matter that will be addressed in more detail at such time as staff seek any decisions from Council on entering into any Funding Agreement.

Water Services Entities Bill

4.20     On 2 June 2022, the Water Services Entities Bill was introduced to Parliament. The first reading of the Bill occurred on 9 June 2022, and the Bill was referred to the Finance and Expenditure Select Committee.

4.21     On 10 June 2022 the Select Committee began accepting submissions on the Bill and submissions will be accepted until 22 July 2022.

Community Engagement on the Water Services Entities Bill

4.22     Council issued media releases in December 2021 and again in June 2022 inviting public feedback to inform its submission on the Bill. Feedback was received by means of an online survey/questionnaire, in person, via phone and via video.

4.23     Public forum engagement sessions were held on 29 and 30 June 2022. This provided an opportunity for the public to talk to Elected Members on the Water Services Entities Bill. 

4.24     Council’s website information and media releases also identified that the public could make their own submissions directly to Government through the Select Committee process.

4.25     111 written submissions were received by Council and 17 individuals and groups spoke to their submission.

4.26     The Complete Feedback and Summary Feedback documents are attached to this report. Key themes from the feedback were focused on governance, ownership, proportional representation, additional bureaucracy, and cross-subsidisation.

4.27     Those in support of the Bill noted the value of being able to increase borrowing, the current and future waters infrastructure challenges needing to be addressed, and the positive position Nelson was in.

4.28     The key themes from the public feedback have been considered and have informed the draft Council submission.

5.       Discussion

5.1       The draft Council submission has been informed by feedback from the community, consideration of submissions by Local Government New Zealand and Taituara, and by staff knowledge from across Finance, Infrastructure, Engagement, and Strategy areas.

5.2       The submission focuses on the following key areas: Governance arrangements, Accountability, Consumer Interests; Protection against Privatisation; and Transitional Arrangements.

6.       Options

6.1       Council can choose to approve the draft Council submission to the Finance and Expenditure Select Committee on the Water Services Entities Bill; amend the draft Council submission; or not to approve the draft Council submission.

6.2       Staff recommend Option 1. To approve the draft Council submission to the Finance and Expenditure Select Committee on the Water Services Entities Bill.

 

Option 1: Approve the draft Council submission. Recommended option  

Advantages

·   Provides feedback to the Government on Council’s perspective on how Water Services are best delivered

·   Enables Government to make changes to improve the draft legislation on how Water Services Entities are delivered

Risks and Disadvantages

·   Submission does not fully accord with views of all of the community

Option 2: Amend the draft Council submission.

Advantages

·    Allows for changes to be made to the submission prior to it being submitted

Risks and Disadvantages

·    The submission changes and approvals are unable to be effectively implemented before submissions close

Option 2: Not approve the draft Council submission.

Advantages

·    Council not committed by submission content

·    Those opposed to the Three Waters Reform may see this as Council rejecting the reforms

Risks and Disadvantages

·    Feedback not raised with Government

·    Potential improvements to the draft legislation not incorporated

 

7.       Conclusion

7.1       The Government has mandated the Three Waters Reform program, with Nelson City Council in Water Services Entity C. The Water Services Entities are to be operational on 1 July 2024.

7.2       Council has engaged the public on the Water Services Entities Bill and has taken that feedback into account in the preparation of this draft submission to the Finance and Expenditure Select Committee.

8.       Next Steps

8.1       Following a decision from Council, officers will submit the draft submission to the Finance and Expenditure Select Committee and report back to Council when further information on the Three Waters Services Entities Bill is announced.

 

Author:          Alec Louverdis, Group Manager Infrastructure

Attachments

Attahcments will be provided under separate coverl

 

Important considerations for decision making

1.     Fit with Purpose of Local Government

Central government objectives of improvement to the provision of water services supports the social, economic, environmental and cultural wellbeing of the community.

2.     Consistency with Community Outcomes and Council Policy

This report content supports the following community outcomes:

·     Our Council provides leadership and fosters partnerships, regional perspective and community engagement

3.     Risk

There are organisational risks to Council in transitioning to a new Water Services Entity. These were outlined in the 23 September Council report. However, the Government has mandated the reforms program. The Chief Executive will continue to keep Council informed on the progress of the transitional arrangements as more information is known.

4.     Financial impact

There are significant long-term financial impacts relating to the transfer of three water assets and management to a new Water Services Entity, but these are not in relation to this submission process.

5.     Degree of significance and level of engagement

The matter of Three Waters Reform generally is of significance because there is a wide range of interest from community members and groups. This report however is limited to seeking a decision on lodging a submission on the Bill as part of the Select Committee process. As such the significance of the report, as assessed against Councils’ Significance and Engagement Policy, is low to medium. Council sought feedback from the community to inform the draft submission.

6.     Climate Impact

Climate mitigation and adaption, resilience and environmental impacts are drivers of the reform process. There are no specific impacts arising from this report.

7.     Inclusion of Māori in the decision making process

The Crown is leading the engagement with iwi/Māori and mana whenua.

8.     Delegations

This is a matter for Council

 


 

Item 11: Tahunanui off-street parking

 

Council

12 July 2022

 

 

REPORT R26497

Tahunanui off-street parking

 

 

1.       Purpose of Report

1.1       To note the options considered to provide for off-street parking at Tahunanui to replace on-street carparks that will be lost when the southbound merge lanes are reinstated by Waka Kotahi.

1.2       To note that no reasonably practical viable options explored by Council have emerged to address this issue. 

2.       Summary

2.1       Council endorsed the Nelson Future Access Business Case (NFA) on 28 October 2021 and the Waka Kotahi Board approved the Business Case at its meeting of 16 December 2021.

2.2       The permanent reinstatement of the southbound merge lane by Waka Kotahi (initially scheduled for late 2022, but now planned for early 2023) is included in the approved Business Case and the responsibility to assess options for short to medium term off-street parking rests with Council.

2.3       No single proposal has support and therefore no solution, either temporary or long-term, is emerging as feasible.

2.4       Waka Kotahi remains committed to ensuring safety to all property owners.  

2.5       This report presents options explored by officers and highlights work undertaken by officers to date in trying to find a workable solution.     

3.       Recommendation

That the Council

1.    Receives the report Tahunanui off-street parking (R26497) and its attachments (A2906154 and  A2909737); and

2.    Notes the work undertaken to explore off-street parking options pending the reinstatement of the Tahunanui southbound merge lanes by Waka Kotahi; and

3.    Notes that no reasonably practical proposal option to replace off-street parking when Waka Kotahi reinstates the southbound Tahunanui Drive merge lanes has been identified at this stage; and 

4.    Notes that officers will continue to explore options and report any opportunities back to Council; and   

5.    Notes that officers will continue to work and liaise with Waka Kotahi to ensure that safety matters are addressed for all users prior to the reinstatement of the Tahunanui southbound merge lanes. 

 

 

4.       Background

4.1       The background can be accessed via the link to the 28 October 2020 Council report. For ease of reading the relevant section from that report in relation to the southbound lane and parking is copied below.

11. Bisley/Tahunanui southbound merge

11.1 The Business Case recommends that the southbound merge lane be made permanent following a safety review and considerable concern about safety by the community. Making the merge lane permanent will:

11.1.1 Provide significant additional people and freight moving capacity through the intersection;

11.1.2 Result in a corresponding drop in rat running through the Port Hills;

11.1.3 Will make enforcement easier; and

11.1.4 Will ensure safe and visible access to the local residents and businesses.

11.2 This is an emotive issue and was not supported by the Tahunanui community or businesses. It is recognised that the chemist, doctor’s rooms and medlab are essential local services and that removing on-street parking outside of these businesses will make it more difficult for the community to access these services.

11.3 To move this forward, officers propose to commence work on assessing options for any short to medium term off-street parking. This work will be co-ordinated with Waka Kotahi’s timing of their planned southbound merge scheduled for 2022/23. Any solution would be funded fully by NCC”.

4.2       Council, in the matter of the southbound lanes, resolved as follows (the full resolution is appended as Attachment 1):

           “Notes that officers will progress with assessing off-street parking options in Tahunanui, pending the permanent reinstatement of the southbound lane at Bisley signals, and will report back to Council on this matter.

           Notes that a safe state highway network through Tahunanui remains a priority for Nelson City Council and its community.” 

4.3       Waka Kotahi have advised that reinstatement of the southbound lanes will most likely be undertaken by the end of this calendar year, and that they are still committed to ensuring that safety for all property owners is addressed. 

5.       Survey data

5.1       The assessment of proposals is focussed on options that would assist less able customers (those that cannot walk long distances or struggle to cross SH6) accessing the three health care providers, namely:

·    Tāhunanui Pharmacy at 11 Tāhunanui Drive;

·    Tāhunanui Medical Centre at 23 Tāhunanui Drive; and

·    Medlab at 25 Tāhunanui Drive.

5.2       Council recently surveyed parking occupancy in Tāhunanui. This was a snapshot on a typical Thursday and Saturday in May 2021 (not the summer peak). The survey shows that for the ten on street parking spaces on the left hand side of Tāhunanui Drive (travelling south) between Bisley Avenue and the pedestrian refuge near the Medlab building that the average occupancy rates were:

·      For a Thursday between 9am and 4:30pm – approximately 40%;

·      For a Thursday peak - 70% (7 vehicles);

·      For the Saturday between 9am and 2pm – approximately 20%;

·      For the Saturday peak - 50% (5 vehicles) – it was also observed that Saturday had a poor compliance with the posted time restrictions.

6.       Options

6.1       A total of 11 options were initially developed to replace the nine short term on-street carparks that will be lost through the re instatement of the southbound lane on SH6 at the Bisley Avenue signals. Refer to Attachment 2 for details of the assessment. 

6.2       There were four options that ranked highly in the desktop analysis and were further investigated. These were:

6.2.1    Option 1 within the car yard;

6.2.2    Option 2 over number 7 Tahunanui Drive; and 

6.2.3    Options 4 and 5 on the ROW between the pharmacy and the medical centre.

7.       Engagement

7.1       Engagement on the options was undertaken with all the businesses (Tāhunanui Pharmacy, Tāhunanui Medical Centre and Medlab) and adjacent commercial and residential landowners.

7.2       The health care providers prefer option 4 or 5 which involved carparks over the stormwater drain on the ROW between the pharmacy and the medical centre. However not all owners of the ROW are prepared to have a lease/easement or property sale over a portion of the right of way to enable this to happen.

7.3       Engagement with the landowners associated with options 1 and 2, the car yard and number 7 Tahunanui Drive was also undertaken. Neither landowners wish to sell or lease their properties and buildings and again neither option is feasible.

7.4       An additional option was suggested by landowners during the engagement over the pharmacy property. This was investigated with the owner of the pharmacy but is not viable.

8.       Discussion

8.1       Officers have undertaken a comprehensive analysis of all options to provide easy access and off-street parking in close proximity to the businesses. All feasible options pursued with landowners, businesses and residents have not been able to be progressed.

8.2       Whilst those customers that do not require assistance are able to find parking elsewhere and make their way safely to those businesses, there are no viable options for those with mobility issues, apart from the off street carparks associated with the three medical facilities.

8.3       Waka Kotahi will need to work with the businesses to ensure that when the southbound lanes are made permanent that all health and safety issues are considered and mitigated.

9.       Financials

9.1       No funding exists in the budget to undertake any option.  

10.     Options

10.1     There are no options to be considered in this report. This report is providing Council with feedback. 

11.     Conclusion

11.1     Officers have undertaken a full assessment of options to provide off-street parking to accommodate the loss of on-street parking that when the southbound merge lanes are made permanent by Waka Kotahi. No options are feasible.

 

 

Author:          Alec Louverdis, Group Manager Infrastructure

Attachments

Attachment 1:   A2906154 - Resolution from 28Oct2021 meeting

Attachment 2:   A2909737 - Tahunanui Options Assessment Report Version 5  

 

Important considerations for decision making

1.   Fit with Purpose of Local Government

The matter of this report sits within the NFA Business Case, which aligns very well with the purpose of local government in that it enables democratic local decision-making and progresses a programme that promotes the social, economic, environmental, and cultural wellbeing of communities for the future.

2.   Consistency with Community Outcomes and Council Policy

1.       The matter of making the southbound lanes permanent and consideration of off-street parking will contribute to the following community outcomes:

2.       “Our infrastructure is efficient, cost effective and meets current and future needs”; “Our communities are healthy, safe, inclusive and resilient”; “Our region is supported by an innovative and sustainable economy”.

3.   Risk

The matter of making the southbound lanes permanent and consideration of off-street is a contentious issue as noted in the October 2021 report to Council. The fact that there are no feasible off-street parking options will likely increase the risk of a negative response from those Tahunanui residents that are unhappy with the decision to make the southbound lanes permanent. However, extensive engagement with affected parties has been undertaken.

4.   Financial impact

There is no funding available to give effect to any of the options presented in this report. However, as no options are feasible there are no budget implications for Council.

5.   Degree of significance and level of engagement

All off-street parking potential solutions involve adjacent commercial and residential landowners and targeted engagement with these parties has been undertaken.

6.   Climate Impact

The impact of climate change as not been assessed in this report, but the NFA did consider matters relating to impact on climate.

7.   Inclusion of Māori in the decision making process

No engagement with Māori has been undertaken in preparing this report.

8.   Delegations

As the delegations for this matter fall within the Regional Transport Committee and Infrastructure Committee, therefore are cross-committee and to be considered by Council.   This matter was previously considered by Council.

 


 

Item 11: Tahunanui off-street parking Attachemnt 1

PDF Creator


 

Item 11: Tahunanui off-street parking Attachment 2

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

Item 12: Outdoor Dinning Structure on Hardy Street

 

Council

12 July 2022

 

 

REPORT R26987

Outdoor Dining Structure on Hardy Street

 

 

1.       Purpose of Report

1.1       To consider the application received by the owner of 274-278 Hardy Street (hospitality premises known as Parts & Service, and Urban), for installation of a structure in road reserve to provide covered outdoor seating.

1.2       To consider the future extension of outdoor dining structures for the owner of 280 Hardy Street (hospitality premises known as Sprig & Fern).

2.       Recommendation

 

That the Council

1.    Receives the report Request for Outdoor Dining Structure on Hardy Street (R26987) and its attachment (A2910349); and

2.    Approves the application for an outdoor dining structure outside 274-278 Hardy Street (Parts & Services and Urban), subject to the applicant securing all consents and all necessary Council signoffs; and

3.    Approves an outdoor dining structure outside 280 Hardy Street (Sprig and Fern) should an application be received, subject to the applicant securing all consents and all necessary Council signoffs; and

4.    Delegates all future approvals for outdoor dining structures to the Chief Executive.   

 

 

3.       Background

3.1       Officers have been approached by the owner and operator of both Parts & Service, and Urban with an application for the installation of a structure, over the area currently leased by these businesses as outdoor dining licenses on road reserve.

3.2       This central city location has approval for outdoor dining, however under the Outdoor Dining Policy 2000 (clause 25), the License holder cannot make any structural changes or alteration to the footpath without prior written approval from the Chief Executive. Due to the change in urban design, the precedent it will set, and the higher public impact than just tables and chairs, the Acting Chief Executive has referred this issue to Council for decision.

3.3       Installing a structure of this significance will be a first for the outdoor dining areas in Nelson. Officers seek Council approval for this structure, and following any Council decision on this matter, will assess all future applications on a case-by-case basis with approval delegated to the Chief Executive.

4.       Discussion

Proposed Structure

4.1       The proposal is to erect a pergola type structure to cover the leased outdoor dining areas for Urban and Parts & Service restaurants at 274 – 278 Hardy Street. Refer to Attachment 1. 

4.2       The structure is considered to be a financial investment for the business and will enable a more viable and attractive setting for outdoor dining all year round. The proposed structure will also eliminate intermittent use of umbrellas and will be able to provide warmth for patrons during the winter.

4.3       The proposed structure would be free standing, supported by concrete footings which would be secured and sit flush with the pavement and have blinds that will only be used to provide shelter from bad weather. The blinds will be tucked away for an open feel during warmer summer months. Officers have met with the applicant and have outlined that having the area open all year round is desireable to enhance the activation of our streets by pedestrians.

4.4       The roof would be permanent and constructed in a clear roofing product which provides 99.9% UV protection and enables a safe outside seating space in terms of exposure to sun.

4.5       The Sprig and Fern Hardy Street (280 Hardy Street) intends to match the design for consistency, but is waiting to see if Council approves this concept first.

4.6       The structure would be regularly maintained by the licensee.

4.7       The structure will not impact pedestrian thoroughfare of the Hardy Street footpath, and designs will incorporate column placement to reduce hazards to those walking to and from the dining area. 

4.8       The structure proposed is in addition to what is currently leased as outdoor dining space. This area is not usable or available to surrounding business, and for this reason, the applicant has been in discussion with directly affected businesses about this proposal. Feedback is being gathered from directly adjacent businesses and will be presented to Council during the meeting.   

4.9       Construction would be completed offsite, and the structure would be delivered and installed with minimal disruption to the city centre users. This proposal is supported by the City Development Team. Council’s City Centre Development Programme Lead has met with the applicant on site and offered advice on how this can enhance a more positive outdoor dining experience. Councils Transportation, Utility, and Parks teams all support the concept in principle, noting the points below.

4.10     The initiative supports Nelson’s great hospitality in Te Ara ō Whakatū (City Centre Spatial Plan) by enhancing Hardy Street as Nelson’s Arts and Eats Street. 

Consents /Approvals

4.11     Should Council approve the ‘outdoor dining structure application, the applicant will be required to obtain a resource consent, building consent and provide detailed plans for Infrastructure approval. Should all the above be approved, Council would enter a new, or updated license to occupy with the applicant to outline maintenance obligations, ownership, and future modification/removal requirements.

4.12     Given the significant investment required and time involved in obtaining the necessary approvals, completing the detailed designs and installing such a structure, the applicant first seeks approval from Council to progress the concept.  

Services

4.13     In order for this structure to be installed in its proposed location, an existing streetlight would need to be relocated. The applicant has asked that the cost of relocation for this streetlight be split with Council. Officers believe that a cost share in this matter is appropriate and could provide $7,500 toward the cost (total $11,000) from existing operational budgets. This contribution would be made acknowledging the significant investment required by the applicant in installing such a structure, which benefits the wider hospitality sector and city centre by inviting more people into Nelson’s city centre during all times of the year.

4.14     During the detailed design phase, underground services will be located and incorporated into the design. This will ensure the structure does not impede access for the operation and maintenance of both Council and third-party utility operators. During this phase, these entities will be consulted regarding the proposal. It shall be noted that the nearby street tree will not be impacted by this proposal.   

5.       Options

5.1       Two options exist. Either to approve the application for an outdoor dining structure (subject to further consents and license to occupy agreements) or decline approval of the concept of the outdoor dining structure halting further work.

 

Option 1: Approve the application for the outdoor dining structure (recommended option)

Advantages

·   Council supporting local hospitality businesses.

·   Creating and encouraging a lively, prospering city centre.

·   Provides the hospitality operators with some confidence to invest further in design and consent 

Risks and Disadvantages

·   Cost of relocating existing infrastructure

·   Semi-permanent structure 

Option 2: Decline the application for the outdoor dining structure

Advantages

·    No further staff time/resource required

·    No relocation of services

Risks and Disadvantages

·    Negative reputational risk with retailers and hospitality owners. 

·    Limited outdoor dining options within the city centre during winter.

 

 

Author:          Matt Bruce, Team Leader Transport and Solid Waste

Attachments

Attachment 1:   A2910349 - Plans and Sketches for 274-278 Hardy Street  

 

Important considerations for decision making

1.   Fit with Purpose of Local Government

The matter of this report sits within Councils outdoor dining policy, which aligns well with the purpose of local government in that it enables and supports a vibrant city centre, contributing to the social and economic wellbeing of the community.

2.   Consistency with Community Outcomes and Council Policy

1.       The matter of approving an outdoor dining structure will contribute to the following community outcomes:

 “Our communities are healthy, safe, inclusive and resilient”; “Our region is supported by an innovative and sustainable economy”.

3.   Risk

The matter of approving an outdoor dining structure on Hardy Street poses little risk to Council given the procedures and approvals required of the applicant to ensure such a structure is installed safely and efficiently.

4.   Financial impact

There is a small amount of funding that officers have identified from existing operational budgets that can support this application, and the costs associated with the relocation of Council assets.

5.   Degree of significance and level of engagement

Directly affected businesses (applicant) and surrounding businesses have been involved in the preparation of this application. 

6.   Climate Impact

The impact of climate change as not been assessed in this report.

7.   Inclusion of Māori in the decision making process

No engagement with Māori has been undertaken in preparing this report.

8.   Delegations

        As the delegations for this matter fall within the Infrastructure Committee and Urban Development Subcommittee, therefore are cross-committee and to be considered by Council.  

 


Item 12: Outdoor Dining Structure on Hardy Street: Attachment 1

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator