Strategic Development and Property
Subcommittee Minutes - 11 February 2021
Present: Councillor
G Noonan (Chairperson), Her Worship the Mayor R Reese, Councillors Y Bowater, T
Brand, T Skinner, Mr J Murray and Mr J Peters
In
Attendance: Councillor J Edgar, Chief Executive (P
Dougherty), Group Manager Strategy and Communications (N McDonald), Group
Manager Community Services (A White), Group Manager Corporate Services (N
Harrison), Governance Adviser (E-J Ruthven) and Governance Support (P Boutle)
Apologies : Her
Worship the Mayor (for lateness)
1. Apologies
|
Resolved SDAP/2021/001
|
|
|
That
the Strategic Development and Property Subcommittee
1. Receives
and accepts the apology from Her Worship the Mayor R Reese for lateness.
|
|
Noonan/Brand Carried
|
2. Confirmation of
Order of Business
The
Chairperson advised there was one late item for the confidential part of the
meeting, and that the following resolution needed to be passed for the item to
be considered:
2.1 Brook Valley
Holiday park Long-Term Occupancy Compliance
|
Resolved SDAP/2021/002
|
|
|
That the Strategic
Development and Property Subcommittee
1. Considers
the confidential item regarding Brook Valley Holiday Park Long-Term Occupancy
Compliance at this meeting as a major item not on the agenda, pursuant to
Section 46A(7)(a) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings
Act 1987, to enable a timely decision to be made.
|
|
Bowater/Brand Carried
|
3. Interests
There were no updates to the
Interests Register.
Mr Murray subsequently declared
an interest in the confirmation of the confirmation of minutes of the Strategic
Development and Property Subcommittee meeting of 26 November 2020 (confidential
agenda item 1), as well as during the confidential item Brook Valley Holiday
Park Long-Term Occupancy Compliance (confidential late agenda item 1).
4. Public Forum
There was no public forum.
5. Confirmation of
Minutes
5.1 26
November 2020
Document number M15293, agenda
pages 7 - 9 refer.
|
Resolved SDAP/2021/003
|
|
|
That
the Strategic Development and Property Subcommittee
1. Confirms
the minutes of the meeting of the Strategic Development and Property
Subcommittee, held on 26 November 2020, as a true and correct record.
|
|
Bowater/Skinner Carried
|
6. Chairperson's Report
|
Councillor Noonan gave a verbal Chairperson’s
Report. She outlined issues that had been raised with her in relation
to the Marina, and requested an update from officers on the governance model
for the marina.
Attendance: Her Worship the Mayor R Reese joined the
meeting at 9.07a.m.
The meeting was adjourned from 9.09a.m. to 9.12a.m.
At the Chair’s invitation, Manager Parks and
Facilities, Rosie Bartlett, outlined work underway on the transition plan to
bring management of the Marina back in-house. Parks and Facilities
Activity Planner, Jane Loughnan, gave an update regarding work underway on the
Marina Master Plan.
Councillor Noonan also noted the subcommittee’s
responsibility for the Haven precinct, and requested a report to a future
subcommittee meeting outlining the strategic purpose for which the Haven
properties were purchased, and whether it was possible to move forward with
expressions of interest in these buildings.
|
|
Resolved SDAP/2021/004
|
|
|
That the Strategic
Development and Property Subcommittee
1. Receives the verbal
Chairperson’s Report.
|
|
Noonan/Bowater Carried
|
6. Nelson Marina -
Setting fees for 2021/22
Document number R22544, agenda
pages 10 - 20 refer.
|
Manager Parks and Facilities, Rosie Bartlett and Parks and
Facilities Activity Planner, Jane Loughnan, presented the report. They
answered questions regarding the frequency of fee increases, proposed
engagement regarding fees and charges increases, and communications with
marina users.
Questions were raised regarding the legal context for
increasing Marina fees and charges, and the Chief Executive, Pat Dougherty,
advised that the meeting would move into confidential session in order for
questions to be answered.
The meeting was adjourned from 9.33a.m. to 9.38a.m.
|
7. Exclusion of the
Public
|
Resolved SDAP/2021/005
|
|
|
That the Strategic
Development and Property Subcommittee
1. Excludes the
public from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting.
2. The
general subject of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded,
the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter and the specific
grounds under section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and
Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution are as follows:
|
|
Bowater/Brand Carried
|
|
Item
|
General subject of each matter to be considered
|
Reason for passing this resolution in relation to
each matter
|
Particular interests protected (where applicable)
|
|
1
|
Nelson
Marina – Setting fees for 2021/22
|
Section 48(1)(a)
The public conduct of
this matter would be likely to result in disclosure of information for which
good reason exists under section 7
|
The
withholding of the information is necessary:
· Section
7(2)(g)
To maintain legal
professional privilege
|
The meeting went into confidential session at 9.38a.m.
and resumed in public session at 10.06a.m.
8. Nelson Marina -
Setting fees for 2021/22 (item 7 cont.)
|
Along with the Chief Executive, Pat Dougherty, Ms Bartlett
and Ms Loughnan answered further questions regarding increasing fees and
charges by the Consumer Price Index rather than the Local Government Cost
Index, inclusion of the proposed increases in Council’s draft Long Term
Plan, and the future Marina financial review.
|
|
Resolved SDAP/2021/007
|
|
|
That the Strategic
Development and Property Subcommittee
1. Receives the report Nelson
Marina - Setting fees for 2021/22 (R22544)
and its attachment (A2541155); and
2. Notes
the proposed increase in marina fees and charges set out in section 5 of the
report Nelson Marina - Setting fees for 2021/22 (R22544) and its attachment
(A2541155); and
3. Agrees to the consultation approach
identified in section 6 of report R22544 for marina fees and charges for
2021/22; and
4. Notes that following
consultation a further report will recommend marina fees and charges for
2021/22 to be set by Council by resolution.
|
|
Skinner/Brand Carried
|
9. Exclusion
of the Public
|
Resolved SDAP/2021/008
|
|
|
That the Strategic
Development and Property Subcommittee
1. Excludes the
public from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting.
2. The general subject of each
matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason for passing
this resolution in relation to each matter and the specific grounds under
section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987
for the passing of this resolution are as follows:
|
|
Bowater/Skinner Carried
|
|
Item
|
General subject of each matter to be
considered
|
Reason for passing this resolution in
relation to each matter
|
Particular interests protected (where applicable)
|
|
1
|
Strategic Development and Property
Subcommittee Meeting – Confidential Minutes - 26 November 2020
|
Section 48(1)(a)
The public conduct of this matter would
be likely to result in disclosure of information for which good reason exists
under section 7.
|
The withholding of the information is
necessary:
· Section 7(2)(a)
To
protect the privacy of natural persons, including that of a deceased person
|
|
2
|
Status Report - Confidential
|
Section 48(1)(a)
The public conduct of this
matter would be likely to result in disclosure of information for which good
reason exists under section 7
|
The withholding of the information is necessary:
· Section 7(2)(a)
To protect the privacy of
natural persons, including that of a deceased person
· Section
7(2)(h)
To enable the local
authority to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial
activities
· Section
7(2)(i)
To enable the local
authority to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations
(including commercial and industrial negotiations)
|
|
3
|
Strawbridge Square Improvements
|
Section
48(1)(a)
The public
conduct of this matter would be likely to result in disclosure of information
for which good reason exists under section 7
|
The withholding of the information is
necessary:
· Section
7(2)(h)
To enable the
local authority to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial
activities
|
|
4
|
Brook Valley Holiday Park Long-Term Occupancy
Compliance
|
Section 48(1)(a)
The public conduct of this matter
would be likely to result in disclosure of information for which good reason
exists under section 7
|
The withholding of the information is necessary:
· Section 7(2)(a)
To protect the privacy of
natural persons, including that of a deceased person
· Section
7(2)(g)
To maintain legal
professional privilege
|
The meeting went into confidential session at 10.16a.m.
and resumed in public session at 12.47p.m.
There being no further business the meeting ended at 12.47p.m.
Confirmed as a correct record of proceedings:
Chairperson
Date
Item 6: Chairperson's
Report
|
|
Strategic Development and Property Subcommittee
1 April 2021
|
REPORT R23749
Chairperson's
Report
1. Purpose
of Report
1.1 To
provide the Chairperson’s report to the Subcommittee.
2. Recommendation
|
That the Strategic Development and Property
Subcommittee
1. Receives
the report Chairperson's Report (R23749) and its attachment (Page from
A2558791).
|
2. Background
2.1 The
establishment of this subcommittee has provided an opportunity to focus on the
items within our delegations that has sometimes been a challenge in the past
under the standing committees.
2.2 One
area of focus is the marina and we are pleased to have a Marina Manager within
Council. I would like to welcome Nigel Skeggs to the team and offer him any
support in this new role. Much thanks to Rosie and her team for the work they
have put in to-date.
2.3 Some
of the reporting required by the subcommittee has not, as yet, been provided
through the transition and we are working on delivering, potentially, a new
model to provide what the subcommittee members require in order to have the
necessary oversight of our delegations.
2.4 As
part of the ongoing transition, for this meeting, the updates that would
usually be in a quarterly report will be discussed in this Chair’s report
and updates provided verbally from officers.
3. Quarterly
Report Updates
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8 Marina
expenditure is less than budget by $78,000. Staff time is $36,000 less than budget.
Unprogrammed expenditure is $18,000 behind budget, as it is unpredictable in
nature. Refuse collection costs are under budget by $15,000 due to using a new
provider. Marina activities are reported to the Strategic Development and
Property Sub-Committee.
3.9 Tahuna
Camp income is less than budget by $113,000. The annual wash-up invoicing is yet to be
completed.
3.10 Brook
Camp income is less than budget by $83,000. Overall camp rental income is behind budget
by $80,000 and is mainly due to no international visitors and COVID-19 impacts.
The camp has seen an increase in bookings over the summer period.
3.11 Brook
Camp expenditure is less than budget by $64,000. Service
delivery costs are $34,000 behind budget, however spend will increase with the
increased usage over the summer period by Bay Dreamers and domestic tourists.
Condition assessments have been completed, and the work programme is now
underway, this is currently $31,000 behind budget.
The Marina
3.12 The delegation
for the Nelson Marina sits with the Strategic and Development Sub-committee,
however, is being reported through this Quarterly Report. The management of the
Marina is currently being bought back in house. A transition plan is being worked
through to ensure that the current contractors are informed and can work
towards a termination date of June 2021.
3.13 The position of Marina Manager was advertised in December
2020. The role will manage the Marina and look into the ongoing needs to
manage the Marina. Shortlisting of applicants has been completed with
interviews scheduled for February 2021.
3.14 Work
on the Marina Master plan has begun with Consultants being engaged and
consultation with Stakeholders occurring in February. A draft plan will be
presented to the Strategic Development and Property Subcommittee on the 1 April
2021.
3.15 Community
and Recreation Performance Measures (Marina)
|
What
Council will provide
|
|
Year 3 (2020/21)
|
Qtr 2
2020/21 comment
|
Qtr 2 2020/21
result
|
Evidence that supports the Q2 Result
|
|
Marina
managed to meet demand
|
Marina berth occupation
rates in relation to target
|
Marina
berth occupation of at least 85%
|
97% occupancy
|
On track
|
Marina
operational stats (A2467877, A2438811, A2492267)
|
3.16 Marina
Hardstand Project Page is attached as Attachment 1.
Author: Gaile
Noonan, Chairperson - Strategic Development and Property Subcommittee
Attachments
Attachment 1: Page
from A2558791 - Marina Hardstand Project Sheet Quarter 2 2020/21 ⇩
Item 7: Setting marina
fees and charges for 2021/22
|
|
Strategic Development and Property Subcommittee
1 April 2021
|
REPORT R22618
Setting
marina fees and charges for 2021/22
1. Purpose
of Report
1.1 To
set the fees for the marina for 2021/22.
2. Summary
2.1 Council
consulted on proposed fee increases at the marina from 12 February to 12 March
2021 as was agreed at the Strategic Development and Property Subcommittee
meeting of 11 February 2021.
2.2 This
report outlines the feedback received through that consultation process and
recommends that the Subcommittee makes a recommendation to Council as to the
fees and charges for Council to set by resolution for marina services for
2021/22.
2.3 The
fees and charges consulted on from 12 February to 12 March 2021 represented a
CPI increase on the 2020/21 fees and charges. Taking feedback received over
this period into consideration, officers now recommend minor changes from what
was consulted on, with the details included in this report.
3. Recommendation
|
That the Strategic Development and Property
Subcommittee
1. Receives
the report Setting marina fees and charges for 2021/22 (R22618) and its attachments (A2593065 and
A2595033 and A2593335); and
2. Requests that a detailed
review of marina financials be undertaken prior to setting the 2022/23 fees
for the marina.
|
Recommendation to Council
|
That the
Council
1. Sets the marina fees and
charges for 2021/22 as outlined in Attachment 2 (A2541155) to report R22618;
|
4. Background
4.1 Marina
fees are usually set annually, taking into account current performance, costs,
CPI changes and other relevant factors.
4.2 This
report recommends the fees and charges to be set by Council for the marina for
2021/22 following the consultation process carried out.
4.3 The
report also identifies feedback received through the consultation process that
is not directly related to marina fees and charges, but that can be used for
future marina development. This feedback has been provided to the consultants
preparing the marina master plan as well as to operational staff to address
specific issues raised.
4.4 The
Marina is a closed account, meaning the Marina activities are fully funded from
user charges. The Marina activity funding is separate from core Council
operations.
5. Discussion
5.1 The
Strategic Development and Property Subcommittee received a report on 11
February 2021 identifying the process for setting marina fees for 2021/22. This
process was to consult with users, receive feedback, and make a resolution on
the fees for 2021/22, following feedback received.
5.2 The
resolutions passed by the Subcommittee in February were as follows:
That the Strategic Development
and Property Committee
Notes the
proposed increase in marina fees and charges set out in section 5 of the report
Nelson Marina - Setting fees for 2021/22 (R22544) and its attachment
(A2541155); and
Agrees to the
consultation approach identified in section 6 of report R22544 for marina fees
and charges for 2021/22; and
Notes that
following consultation a further report will recommend marina fees and charges
for 2021/22 to be set by Council by resolution.
6. Consultation
feedback
6.1 Consultation
on fees and charges was carried out as agreed to in the report to the
Subcommittee in February 2021. The proposed changes that were consulted on were
to increase fees in line with CPI, as shown in Attachment 2.
6.2 Twenty
pieces of feedback were submitted over this time and are attached to this
report in Attachment 1.
6.3 The
feedback received falls into two categories:
· Directly
related to fees and charges at the marina for 2021/22
· About
the marina, indirectly related to fees and charges for 2021/22
Directly related feedback
6.4 Of
the feedback directly related to the fees and charges, some suggested the
changes were fair, others that they were not high enough, and others that they
were too high. A summary of the comments raised is shown in the following
sections.
6.5 Those
that suggested the increases were not high enough noted that ratepayers are
paying high rate increases and user costs should also increase at the marina.
6.6 Those
that suggested the proposed fees were too high provided feedback including:
· Other
marina management or operations issues that needed to be addressed prior to
fees being increased.
· Any
increases are difficult for users to pay - not all boat owners have the means
to absorb increased fees.
· Marina
costs are not increasing as much as household costs.
· There
is not enough justification to increases and increases should not be made
without a full review of marina financials.
6.7 Some
users made specific fee suggestions, including the following:
6.7.1 There
has been a discrepancy between cost increases for casual users of the boat ramp
and those using long term storage and annual passes as well as discrepancy
between who is paying for the boat ramp.
6.7.2 One
user suggested there needs to be a rate for a 30 minute lift and hold for waterblasting
racing yachts.
6.7.3 One
suggested no increase for the inspection grid (tidal grid) as they state that
this is an emergency facility.
6.7.4 One
suggested no increase for pile moorings as they state that there are no
services to the moorings.
Other feedback about the
marina
6.8 Feedback
was also received that was not directly related to the fees and charges for
2021/22. The feedback received and staff response to that feedback is attached
as Attachment 3 (A2593335)
6.9 The
feedback that is not directly related to fees and charges will be useful for
officers and will be incorporated into planning, taking consideration of the
master plan, the activity management plan and other strategic pieces of work.
Progress will be reported to the Strategic Development and Property
Subcommittee.
6.10 Those
that submitted will be informed of the Long Term Plan consultation process
where feedback on future development can be considered. All feedback received
has been already provided to the consultants preparing the marina master plan.
7. Proposed
fee changes for 2021/22
7.1 As
a result of the feedback received on the fees and charges, one fee is
recommended to change from what was consulted on. These are listed below. All
other fees are recommended to remain as was consulted on.
7.2 Lift
and wash rates – now recommend new half hour rate
7.2.1 One
user requested a half hour rate for lift and wash (rather than an hour long
rate) for racing boats that are washed frequently. This is not a new fee, but
reflects that the shorter washes should be charged less. Officers now recommend
that this new fee be established. This new fee is shown in Attachment 2.
7.3 All
other fees and charges
7.4 It
is recommended that all other fees continue to increase by what was proposed,
with the understanding that a detailed fee and charge analysis and financial
review will be required to set fees for 2022/23. The feedback received to date
will inform that work.
7.5 Recommended
fees and charges are attached as Attachment 2.
7.6 Further
detail about why other suggested changes are not made at this time are outlined
below:
7.7 Launching
fees – no change from what was consulted on
7.7.1 Two
submissions noted the difference in increases between those launching boats
paying a casual rate compared to those launching with an annual permit or with
boats stored in the long term storage.
7.7.2 The
last two years, the boat ramp casual use fees have not increased due to practical
implementation of rounding. This has resulted in the casual users having no
increase annually, while annual pass ramp users having had an increase.
7.7.3 Currently,
casual ramp fees can be paid at the ramp with coins, paywave or the
pay-by-plate app. The majority of casual users are using paywave. Users can
also pay an annual fee.
7.7.4 Officers
are not recommending an increase in the casual launch fees to address the
discrepancy in 2021/22 but do agree that this needs to be addressed in the future
fees and charges review.
7.7.5 One
submitter commented on the cost discrepancy between those launching boats with
a motorised vessel and those launching by hand. Those that launch using a
motorised vehicle pay a launch fee. Those that launch by hand (i.e. waka ama,
rowing, kayaks etc) do not pay a launch fee.
7.7.6 A further inconsistency to this
rule is that sea sport users launching by motorised vehicle also have not
historically been paying a fee to launch. Officers will talk to sea sport users
and require these users to pay fees for launching vessels where vessels are
launched by vehicle rather than by hand. Annual permits are $105 per year per
boat, so there will be additional costs for the clubs to pay.
7.7.7 The
future fees and charges review will consider a better model for charging fees
and to ensure that there is clarity on what the fees pay for – whether
that is for use of the ramp, or use of the ramp and parking – as this
will assist with some of the comments raised by users. It will also need to
consider better aligning the difference in fees between annual users and casual
users as well as making it clear about which users are required to pay fees.
7.8 Inspection
ramp (Tidal grid) – no change from what was consulted on (CPI increase)
7.8.1 One
submitter suggested that the grid is used as an emergency facility and fee
increases should not be applied to it. A CPI increase is a 50c increase on the
2020/21 fees. Officers recommend the CPI increase be implemented.
7.8.2 It
should be noted however, that there is a business case under development that
will identify work needed at the inspection grid and increased costs to cover
that work or whether the facility should continue to be used at all. The
business case needs to consider the clean marina programme and implications of
this.
7.9 Pile
berth – no change from what was consulted on (CPI increase)
7.9.1 One
submitter suggested that no increase should be in place for the pile berths,
given they do not use as many services. The fees for the pile berths are
reduced from the pontoon berths which already reflects the reduced services.
Officers recommend that pile berth fees are increased by CPI in 2021/22 as was
originally proposed.
Detailed fees
and charges review and future changes
7.10 It
is anticipated that once the detailed fees and charges review of the marina is
completed and the marina management model, levels of service, governance model,
and master plan have been completed, further changes to the fees may be
identified that better reflect the costs of the services provided. This will be
carried out prior to the start of the 2022/23 financial year, with the process
to review the fees starting much earlier than this.
7.11 The
detailed review will address the concerns raised in some submissions about the
process and cost recovery for marina fees.
7.12 A
consultation process on any future proposed changes would be recommended
following assessment of significance in accordance with Council’s
Significance and Engagement Policy.
8. Options
The Strategic Development and
Property Subcommittee can recommend Council set the fees and charges for
2021/22 to those in Attachment Two, can set the fees and charges at the rates
that it consulted the users on, or can decide not to make changes and
instead set them at the 2020/21 amounts. Option 1 is recommended.
|
Option 1: Set the fees and
charges for 2021/22 as per those in Attachment 2 (A2595033) (Recommended)
|
|
Advantages
|
· Users
have provided feedback on the fees and charges, which has been taken into
account
· Fees
are increased by a small amount, taking into account feedback received. CPI
increases are common across other Council fees.
· Fees
are set following a thorough consultation process
|
|
Risks and Disadvantages
|
· Setting
the fees in this way does not satisfy all feedback provided by users.
· Setting
the fees in this way is not done following a detailed financial analysis.
|
|
Option
2: Set the fees and charges for 2021/22 to as what was consulted on from 12
February to 12 March 2021
|
|
Advantages
|
· Fees
are set following a thorough consultation process, with no changes made
following consultation
· Fees
are increased by a small amount, taking into account feedback received. CPI
increases are common across other Council fees.
|
|
Risks and Disadvantages
|
· No
changes made following consultation
· Setting
the fees in this way does not satisfy all feedback provided by users.
· Setting
the fees in this way is not done following a detailed financial analysis.
|
|
Option
3: Set fees for 2021/22 by resolution the same as those for 2020/21, in order
to continue to charge the same fees until further financial analysis has been
completed,
|
|
Advantages
|
· No
fee changes in 2021/22, and current fees confirmed to continue
|
|
Risks and Disadvantages
|
· No
increase in fees in 2021/22 means that there may be an even higher fee
increase in future years, following a detailed financial analysis.
|
9. Conclusion
9.1 This
report seeks the Subcommittee’s recommendation to Council to set the
marina fees and charges for 2021/22 following consultation to those outlined in
Attachment 2, which includes minor changes following the feedback received.
10. Next Steps
10.1 Council
decision on fees and charges for 2021/22.
10.2 Inform
marina users of the fee changes for 2021/22 and notify them that a detailed
review will be undertaken in the next financial year.
10.3 New
fees in place from 1 July 2021.
10.4 Other
feedback provided by submitters is reviewed, and actions from it prioritised.
10.5 Detailed
financial analysis carried out and fees reviewed and set prior to the 2022/23
financial year.
Author: Jane
Loughnan, Parks and Facilities Asset Planner
Attachments
Attachment 1: A2593065
Feedback on proposed fees and charges ⇩
Attachment 2: A2595033
Proposed marina fees and charges for 2021/22 (includes 2020/21 fees,
proposed fees during consultation, and now recommended fees) ⇩
Attachment 3: A2593335
Feedback received and staff responses - not directly related to fees and
charges ⇩
|
Important considerations for decision making
|
|
1. Fit
with Purpose of Local Government
The recommendation in this report follows an
opportunity for the community to provide feedback on the fees and charges at
the marina. The marina is a place where many people recreate and carry
out commercial activities and this process ensured a fair chance for these
users to provide input.
This process has been one that has provided
opportunity for local decision making. It promotes wellbeing by fees and
charges contributing to the costs of the marina, which is a place that
provides for community and social recreation and economic activity.
|
|
2. Consistency
with Community Outcomes and Council Policy
Setting marina fees and charges enables Council to
meet the following community outcomes:
· Our
infrastructure is efficient, cost effective and meets current and future
needs
· Our
Council provides leadership and fosters partnerships, a regional perspective,
and community engagement
· Our region
is supported by an innovative and sustainable economy
|
|
3. Risk
Fees and charges are reviewed
annually and either adjusted in line with the Consumer Price Index or
adjusted to reflect any changes in process and/or costs incurred to Council.
There is a risk that some users that were not
supportive of the proposed fees and charges that were consulted on will not
support the proposed changes.
|
|
4. Financial
impact
An estimate for fees and charges income based on
past trends and the Revenue and Finance Policy is included in Council’s
Long Term Plan.
A detailed financial analysis is required for the
2022/23 fees.
|
|
5. Degree
of significance and level of engagement
This matter is of medium significance because there
are a number of users that will be impacted by a change in fees. The marina
is a self-funding activity, so ratepayer input does not contribute towards
the marina expenses. Therefore consultation was carried out as described in
this report before the fees are set for 2021/22.
|
|
6. Climate
Impact
Setting the fees and charges for the marina does not
have a climate impact.
|
|
7. Inclusion
of Māori in the decision making process
No engagement with Māori has been undertaken in
preparing this report.
|
|
· Delegations
The Strategic Development and Property Subcommittee
has the following delegations in relation to marina fees and charges.
Areas of Responsibility:
· Marina
Precinct
Powers to Decide:
· Undertaking
informal community engagement on matters within the areas of responsibility
· Developing,
monitoring and reviewing strategies, policies and plans, with final versions
to be recommended to Council for approval
Powers to Recommend to Council:
· All
other matters within the areas of responsibility or any other matters
referred to it by Council
A resolution of Council is required for the setting
of marina fees and charges.
|
