AGENDA
Ordinary meeting of the
Works and Infrastructure Committee
Tuesday 22 May 2018
Commencing at 9.00am
Council Chamber
Civic House
110 Trafalgar Street, Nelson
Membership: Chairperson Stuart Walker (Chairperson), Her Worship the Mayor Rachel Reese, Councillors Luke Acland, Bill Dahlberg, Paul Matheson, Matt Lawrey, Gaile Noonan, Tim Skinner and Deputy Chairperson Mike Rutledge (Deputy Chairperson)
Guidelines for councillors attending the meeting, who are not members of the Committee, as set out in Standing Order 12.1:
· All councillors, whether or not they are members of the Committee, may attend Committee meetings
· At the discretion of the Chair, councillors who are not Committee members may speak, or ask questions about a matter.
· Only Committee members may vote on any matter before the Committee
It is good practice for both Committee members and non-Committee members to declare any interests in items on the agenda. They should withdraw from the room for discussion and voting on any of these items.
Works and Infrastructure
Committee
22 May 2018
1. Apologies
Nil
2. Confirmation of Order of Business
3.1 Updates to the Interests Register
3.2 Identify any conflicts of interest in the agenda
Document number M3376
Recommendation
That the Works and Infrastructure Committee
Confirms the minutes of the meeting of the Works and Infrastructure Committee, held on 29 March 2018, as a true and correct record.
6. Chairpersons Report 14 - 15
Document number R9310
Recommendation
That the Committee
Receives the Chairpersons Report (R9310).
7. Status Report - Works and Infrastructure - 22 May 2018 16 - 22
Document number R9262
Recommendation
That the Works and Infrastructure Committee
Receives the report Status Report - Works and Infrastructure - 22 May 2018 (R9262) and its attachment (A1150321).
8. Infrastructure Fees and Charges 2018-19 23 - 28
Document number R9074
Recommendation
That the Works and Infrastructure Committee
Receives the report Infrastructure Fees and Charges 2018-19 (R9074) and its attachment (A1918450); and
Approves the proposed fees and charges as per attachment A1918450 of Report R9074 effective 1 July 2018.
9. Havelock North Drinking Water Government Inquiry 29 - 34
Document number R8851
Recommendation
That the Works and Infrastructure Committee
Receives the report Havelock North Drinking Water Government Inquiry (R8851); and
Notes the findings of the Havelock North Drinking Water Government Enquiry and the likelihood of future change in the drinking water supplier environment.
Public Excluded Business
Recommendation
That the Works and Infrastructure Committee
Excludes the public from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting.
The general subject of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter and the specific grounds under section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution are as follows:
|
Item |
General subject of each matter to be considered |
Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter |
Particular interests protected (where applicable) |
|
1 |
Works and Infrastructure Committee Meeting - Public Excluded Minutes - 29 March 2018 |
Section 48(1)(a) The public conduct of this matter would be likely to result in disclosure of information for which good reason exists under section 7. |
The withholding of the information is necessary: · Section 7(2)(i) To enable the local authority to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations) |
|
2 |
Status Report - Works and Infrastructure - Public Excluded - 22 May 2018
|
Section 48(1)(a) The public conduct of this matter would be likely to result in disclosure of information for which good reason exists under section 7 |
The withholding of the information is necessary: · Section 7(2)(i) To enable the local authority to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations) |
11. Re-admittance of the public
Recommendation
That the Works and Infrastructure Committee
Re-admits the public to the meeting.
Note:
· Youth Councillors Ella Smith and Hayden Rose will be in attendance at this meeting. (delete as appropriate)
Works and Infrastructure Committee Minutes - 29 March 2018
Minutes of a meeting of the Works and Infrastructure Committee
Held in the Council Chamber, Civic House, 110 Trafalgar Street, Nelson
On Thursday 29 March 2018, commencing at 9.08am
Present: S Walker (Chairperson), Her Worship the Mayor R Reese, Councillors L Acland, P Matheson (Deputy Chairperson) and M Lawrey
In Attendance: Councillors B McGurk and I Barker, Chief Executive (P Dougherty), Group Manager Infrastructure (A Louverdis), General Manager Nelson Regional Sewerage business Unit and Nelson Tasman Regional Landfill Business Unit (J Robinson), Group Manager Corporate Services (N Harrison), Team Leader Governance (R Byrne) and Governance Adviser (J Brandt), Youth Councillors (J Stallard and C Leaper)
Apologies: Councillors B Dahlberg, G Noonan and T Skinner
1. Apologies
|
Resolved WI/2018/001 That the Works and Infrastructure Committee Receives and accepts the apologies from Councillors B Dahlberg, G Noonan and T Skinner. Lawrey/Her Worship the Mayor Carried |
2. Confirmation of Order of Business
There was no change to the order of business.
3. Interests
There were no updates to the Interests Register, and no interests with items on the agenda were declared.
4. Public Forum
4.1 Public Forum: Carlo Wiegand - Traffic Calming Konini Street
Carlo Wiegand, accompanied by Anne-Marie Wiegand and Catherine Walker, tabled a presentation (A19440601) and spoke about their concerns regarding very high traffic speeds recorded on Konini Street, and the dangers this posed to pets and residents.
|
Resolved WI/2018/002 That the Works and Infrastructure Committee Receives an update via the Status Report regarding the Konini Street speeding issues raised at public forum. Her Worship the Mayor/Lawrey Carried |
|
Attachments 1 A1940601 - Public Forum - Carlo Wiegand |
5. Confirmation of Minutes
5.1 16 November 2017
Document number M3128, agenda pages 7 - 13 refer.
|
Resolved WI/2018/003 That the Works and Infrastructure Committee Confirms the minutes of the meeting of the Works and Infrastructure Committee, held on 16 November 2017, as a true and correct record. Matheson/Lawrey Carried |
6. Status Report - Works and Infrastructure - 29 March 2018
Document number R9147, agenda pages 14 - 17 refer.
The Chief Executive Pat Dougherty and Group Manager Infrastructure Alec Louverdis answered questions about pedestrian severances on Waimea Road and noted that a report on the matter would go to a future Works and Infrastructure meeting.
|
Resolved WI/2018/004 That the Works and Infrastructure Committee Receives the report Status Report - Works and Infrastructure - 29 March 2018 (R9147) and its attachment (A1150321). Her Worship the Mayor/Matheson Carried |
7. Chairperson's Report
There was no Chairperson’s report.
8. Nelson Tasman Regional Landfill Business Unit - Draft Business Plan 2018/19
Document number R9130, agenda pages 18 - 35 refer.
The General Manager of the Nelson Tasman Regional Landfill Business Unit Jeff Robinson presented the report and answered questions on income; potential risks to the business unit and key performance measures.
It was noted that the next iteration of the report would include a detailed risk analysis.
|
Resolved WI/2018/005 That the Works and Infrastructure Committee Receives the report Nelson Tasman Regional Landfill Business Unit - Draft Business Plan 2018/19 (R9130) and its attachments (A1928700 and A1928697); and Provides feedback for consideration by Council. Lawrey/Acland Carried |
|
Recommendation to Council WI/2018/006 That the Council Receives the report Nelson Tasman Regional Landfill Business Unit - Draft Business Plan 2018/19 (R9130) and its attachments (A1928700 and A1928697) and provides feedback that can be forwarded to the General Manager of the Nelson Tasman Regional Landfill Business Unit; and Approves the Nelson Tasman Regional Landfill Business Unit Deed of Agreement being amended to allow for the retention of up to $300,000 of surpluses to be held in the Business Unit’s closed account for the purpose of managing year-by-year income fluctuations, subject to an equivalent resolution being passed by the Tasman District Council. Lawrey/Acland Carried |
9. Nelson Regional Sewerage Business Unit Draft Business Plan 2018/19
Document number R9131, agenda pages 36 - 59 refer.
The General Manager of the Nelson Regional Sewerage Business Unit, Jeff Robinson presented the report and noted an error in attachment 2, where the totals on agenda page 47 had pulled through incorrectly to page 49. This would be corrected for the final report going to the Council meeting.
Mr Robinson answered questions about the business unit’s commercial clients, forward planning beyond 2025 when the unit was expected to run at capacity, debt reduction, environmental, social and cultural assessments and appointment of an iwi advisor.
Attendance: Councillor Acland left the meeting at 10.23a.m. and returned at 10.25a.m.
The meeting noted that the business plan was an important document and Council engagement with the document was necessary to ensure that the business unit complemented Council’s Long Term Plan, in particularly its high environmental aspirations.
The meeting adjourned at 10.42am and reconvened at 10.56am and Cr Matheson was not present.
Chief Executive Pat Dougherty suggested that the business plan could be addressed in a joint workshop for Nelson City and Tasman District councillors to discuss the strategic direction. Mr Robinson would take the suggestion to a Tasman District Council meeting later that day.
|
Item of business to lie on the table |
|
Resolved WI/2018/007 That the Works and Infrastructure Committee Leaves the item Nelson Regional Sewerage Business Unit Draft Business Plan 2018/19 to lie on the table until a Joint Nelson City Council and Tasman District Council workshop is held to review the strategic direction and a further report be brought to a Works and Infrastructure meeting. Walker/Her Worship the Mayor Carried |
10. Nelson Regional Sewerage Business Unit Annual Report 2016/17
Document number R9132, agenda pages 60 - 91 refer.
Attendance: Councillor Matheson returned to the meeting at 10.59a.m.
|
Resolved WI/2018/008 That the Works and Infrastructure Committee Receives the report Nelson Regional Sewerage Business Unit Annual Report 2016/17 (R9132) and its attachment (A1918255). Acland/Lawrey Carried |
|
Recommendation to Council WI/2018/009 That the Council Receives the Nelson Regional Sewerage Business Unit Annual Report 2016/17 (A1918255) attached to report R9132. Acland/Lawrey Carried |
11. Exclusion of the Public
|
Resolved WI/2018/010 That the Works and Infrastructure Committee Excludes the public from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting. The general subject of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter and the specific grounds under section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution are as follows: Lawrey/Acland Carried |
|
Item |
General subject of each matter to be considered |
Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter |
Particular interests protected (where applicable) |
|
1 |
Works and Infrastructure Committee Meeting - Public Excluded Minutes - 16 November 2017 |
Section 48(1)(a) The public conduct of this matter would be likely to result in disclosure of information for which good reason exists under section 7. |
The withholding of the information is necessary: · Section 7(2)(i) To enable the local authority to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations) |
|
2 |
48 Pascoe Commercial Lease
|
Section 48(1)(a) The public conduct of this matter would be likely to result in disclosure of information for which good reason exists under section 7 |
The withholding of the information is necessary: · Section 7(2)(i) To enable the local authority to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations) |
|
3 |
Status Report - Works and Infrastructure - 29 March 2018
|
Section 48(1)(a) The public conduct of this matter would be likely to result in disclosure of information for which good reason exists under section 7 |
The withholding of the information is necessary: · Section 7(2)(i) To enable the local authority to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations) |
The meeting went into public excluded session at 10.51am and resumed in public session at 11.06am.
12. Re-admittance of the Public
|
Resolved WI/2018/015 That the Works and Infrastructure Committee Re-admits the public to the meeting. Walker/Matheson Carried |
There being no further business the meeting ended at 11.06am.
Confirmed as a correct record of proceedings:
Chairperson
Date
Item 6: Chairpersons Report
|
|
Works and Infrastructure Committee 22 May 2018 |
REPORT R9310
Chairpersons Report
1. Purpose of Report
1.1 To update the Works and Infrastructure Committee on several matters that I think are worthy of noting.
2. Recommendation
|
Receives the Chairpersons Report (R9310). |
3. Discussion
3.1 I wanted to bring to the Committee’s attention several milestones over the last period.
Projects that have been completed
· Bronte Street Footpath Extension;
· Main Road Stoke Pedestrian Refuge;
· York Stream Channel and Intake Upgrades;
· Hilliard, Mules and Suter watermain renewals;
· Resurfacing of Waimea Road;
· Resurfacing and pavement rehabilitation of Wildman Avenue/Vickerman Street Roundabout.
Projects that are underway or about to commence on site
· Neale Park Sewer Pump Station Upgrade;
· Saxton Road Culvert (Orphanage Stream) Upgrade;
· Maire Stream Bank Erosion Repair;
· Bridge Street, Alma Lane and Jenner Road Sewer Relining;
· Brooklands watermain renewal.
Projects/work that have been tendered
· Civic House Floor 1 Upgrade;
· Professional Services Panel;
· Saltwater Creek Bridge;
· Orphanage Creek/Sunningdale Bank Reinstatement;
· Champion Link Road.
Stuart Walker
Chairperson
Attachments
Item 7: Status Report - Works and Infrastructure - 22 May 2018
|
|
Works and Infrastructure Committee 22 May 2018 |
REPORT R9262
Status Report - Works and Infrastructure - 22 May 2018
1. Purpose of Report
1.1 To provide an update on the status of actions requested and pending.
2. Recommendation
|
That the Works and Infrastructure Committee Receives the report Status Report - Works and Infrastructure - 22 May 2018 (R9262) and its attachment (A1150321). |
Jasmin Brandt
Governance Adviser
Attachments
Attachment 1: A1150321 - Status Report - Works and Infrastructure - 22 May 2018 ⇩
Item 8: Infrastructure Fees and Charges 2018-19
|
|
Works and Infrastructure Committee 22 May 2018 |
REPORT R9074
Infrastructure Fees and Charges 2018-19
1. Purpose of Report
1.1 To advise the Committee and approve fees and charges for Utilities (water), Roading and Solid Waste services for the 2018/19 financial year.
2. Recommendation
3. Background
3.1 Fees and Charges are reviewed annually and either adjusted in line with the Consumer Price Index (CPI) or changed to reflect any changes in process and/or costs incurred to Council. This report proposes some increases to Infrastructure fees and charges for 3 areas (Utilities, Roading and Solid Waste).
3.2 Officers currently have delegations to set fees and charges but officers are of the view that approval via the relevant committee is appropriate.
4. Discussion
4.1 Proposed Fees and Charges for Utilities (water) are listed in Table 1 of Attachment 1. A CPI adjustment of 1.6% is proposed across the board as no CPI adjustment was made last year.
4.2 Proposed Fees and Charges for Roading are listed in Table 2 of Attachment 1. A CPI adjustment of 1.6% across the board is proposed. A new category for Corridor Access Requests (CAR’s) relating to Emergency Work has been created. This charge reflects the cost of retrospective approval and reinstatement inspection.
4.1 Proposed Fees and Charges for Solid Waste at the transfer station are listed in Table 3 of Attachment 1. A CPI adjustment of 1.6% across the board is proposed. Two additional changes in transfer station fees and charges are proposed:
4.1.1 An increase in the fee to commercial operators for disposing of hard fill at the Pascoe Street transfer station. Currently it is less expensive for commercial operators to take hard fill to the transfer station than to the regional landfill. Council incurs cartage costs from Pascoe Street to York Valley landfill and so the increased fee has been calculated to incentivise commercial operators to take hard fill directly to the regional landfill at York Valley.
4.1.2 The phasing out of accepting green waste at the Pascoe Street transfer station is in line with the approved 2018-21 Solid Waste Asset Management Plan, and the Joint Waste Management and Minimisation Plan. It is proposed to increase Green waste fees to $35 per m3 from 1 July 2018 with the aim to phase out this service at the transfer station by 30 June 2019. The strategy is based on the premise that our customers will realise that the service can be more economically accessed through commercial service providers.
4.2 Subject to approval by this Committee, all users will be given a minimum 30 days’ notice of the proposed changes prior to implementation.
5. Options
5.1 Option 1 Approve the proposed charges effective 1 July 2018. This is the recommended option.
5.2 Option 2 Do not approve the proposed charges.
6. Conclusion
6.1 Officers recommend that the Works and Infrastructure Committee approve the charges as set out in Attachment 1 of this report.
Margaret Parfitt
Manager Roading and Utilities
Attachments
Attachment 1: A1918450 Proposed Fees and Charges Infrastructure Operations 2018-19 ⇩
|
Important considerations for decision making |
|
1. Fit with Purpose of Local Government Annual review of fees and charges enables Council to meet the current and future needs of communities for good-quality local infrastructure, local public services, in a way that is most cost-effective for households and businesses. |
|
2. Consistency with Community Outcomes and Council Policy Approving amended fees and charges enables Council to carry out activity that is aligned with the community outcome “our infrastructure is efficient, cost effective and meets current and future needs”. |
|
3. Risk Fees and Charges are reviewed annually and either adjusted in line with the Consumer Price Index or changed to reflect any changes in process and/or costs incurred to Council. If proposed changes are not approved the income generated from fees and charges may not cover actual costs incurred and result in a financial shortfall. |
|
4. Financial impact The fees and charges income is included in Council’s Long Term Plan. |
|
5. Degree of significance and level of engagement The recommendations outlined in the report are not considered significant in terms of Council’s Significance Policy. No Formal consultation has occurred with regards to the proposal in this report |
|
6. Inclusion of Māori in the decision making process Maori have not been consulted |
|
7. Delegations The Committee has powers: “To perform all functions, powers and duties relating to the areas of responsibility conferred on Council by relevant legislation and not otherwise delegated to officers”. Currently officers have delegated authority to set fees and charges, however officers are of the view that approval via relevant committee is appropriate. |
Item 9: Havelock North Drinking Water Government Inquiry
|
|
Works and Infrastructure Committee 22 May 2018 |
REPORT R8851
Havelock North Drinking Water Government Inquiry
1. Purpose of Report
1.1 To provide the Committee with an opportunity to consider the stage 2 report from the Havelock North Drinking Water Government Inquiry.
2. Summary
2.1 In August 2016, there was a major outbreak of campylobacteriosis in Havelock North. Investigations traced the source to the drinking water supply administered by the Hastings District Council.
2.2 In September 2016 the Government established an Inquiry to establish the cause of the outbreak and make recommendations for prevention of a similar event in the future.
2.3 The Inquiry was in two stages. The Stage 1 report was issued in May 2017 and covered the background, established the likely cause and assessed the conduct of those responsible for providing safe drinking water to Havelock North. The Stage 2 report was released in December 2017 and focused on improving the safety of drinking water in New Zealand, lessons to be learned from the Havelock North outbreak, and any changes which should be made to the drinking water supply environment to achieve the goal of reliably safe drinking water. Copies of both reports are available in the Councillors Lounge or from the Department of Internal Affairs website: www.dia.govt.nz/Government-Inquiry-Into-Havelock-North-Drinking-Water.
2.4 The Stage 1 report identified short-comings with the parties directly involved in the water supply being the Hastings District Council, the Hawkes Bay Regional Council and the Hawkes Bay District Health Board.
2.5 The Stage 2 report made suggestions for improvement in the national drinking water supply environment, particularly the following:
· Dis-establishment of the current Ministry of Health Unit overseeing drinking water regulation
· Establishment of an independent water regulator
· Establishment of 6 principles to guide water management in NZ
· Mandatory multi-barrier treatment of public water supplies
· Removal of secure groundwater status
· Requirement for a residual disinfectant in the network
· Significant changes to the regulations; water safety plan regime; the National Environmental Standard for Sources of Human Drinking Water and the Drinking Water Assessors regime.
The report also has a section with recommendations that the Government look at aggregating supplies of water.
3. Recommendation
4. Background
4.1 The Havelock North water supply is drawn from sub-surface bores and was untreated at the time of the contamination. The most probable source of the contamination was found to be contaminated surface water from animals grazing a paddock adjacent to one of the water bores, leaching into the aquifer that supplied a drinking water bore.
4.2 Approximately 5,500 residents became ill from the contaminated drinking water and it is possible that the water contributed to the deaths of four people.
5. Discussion
5.1 The Stage 1 Inquiry reviewed the performance of the key bodies that held the responsibility for providing drinking water to Havelock North. This resulted in the following finding:
“This Inquiry has found that several of the parties with responsibility for the water supply regime for Havelock North (in particular the District Council, DWAs (Drinking Water Assessors) and Hawke’s Bay Regional Council (“Regional Council”)) failed to adhere to the high levels of care and diligence necessary to protect public health and to avoid outbreaks of serious illness.”
5.2 An interim measures report was released in December 2016 which recommended, among other things, the establishment of a closer working relationship between the parties through a Joint Working Group, extensive ongoing monitoring of the water supply and chlorination of the water.
5.3 The Stage 2 Inquiry followed on directly from Stage 1 and had a far-ranging brief to look into water supply arrangements throughout the country.
5.4 Fifty one recommendations were made by the Inquiry as part of the Stage 2 report. These broadly fall into the following categories:
· Administrative.
o Promulgate six principles of drinking water safety
o Review NZ standards, Health Act and Drinking Water standards and abolish ‘secure’ classification for bores
o Establish an independent drinking water regulator
o Ministry of Health to improve compliance with existing regulations
o Amend the Resource Management Act to improve water source protection
o Accelerate the review of the National Environmental Standard for Sources of Human Drinking Water.
· Operational.
o Encourage/mandate treatment (chlorination) of water supplies
o Encourage formation of joint working groups to oversee drinking water safety throughout the country
o Introduce licensing and qualification requirements for suppliers and operators
o Create dedicated and aggregated drinking water suppliers,
o Improve the testing and laboratories regime
o Prohibit high risk bore construction techniques.
5.5 The recommendations largely rely on Central Government to enact legislation before they can be implemented. Some progress on these is likely during 2018-19. Those recommendations that encourage treatment of drinking water and improving compliance with existing regulations have already been actioned by the Ministry of Health.
Nelson’s Water Supply
5.6 The Nelson City Council water supply is currently in a better position than many supplies in that the raw water is not sourced from bores and all water from the river sources is currently subject to a double barrier of ultra-filtration membranes and chlorination.
5.7 In terms of the Council risk analysis procedure a failure of the integrity of the treatment process is assessed as follows:
· Consequences (Impact) - Multiple fatalities of workers or public – Extreme (score 5).
· Likelihood – Rare (score 1) given the current treatment process.
· Risk = Consequences x Likelihood = 5 x 1 =5 (Medium rating).
· The Residual Risk Tolerance appropriate for this result assesses the risk as ‘Normally tolerable’ and requires frequent review to look for opportunities to further reduce risk where practicable.
5.8 In order to respond to the above need to reduce the risk Council also has a rigorous testing regime that incorporates the following:
· Ten sites across the City network are tested weekly. All are tested for chlorine residual levels and five are tested for bacteria. The sites chosen vary on a thirteen week cycle.
· Fifteen reservoirs in the City are tested weekly for a range of factors including chlorine residual levels. Five are also tested for bacteria.
· Bacterial testing is carried out at the water treatment plant and the Stoke High Level reservoir twice a month.
· There are continuous chlorine analysers at Monaco View and Todds Bush that allow 24 hour monitoring of chlorine content in the water at the outer edges of the reticulation. The water treatment plant also has two continuous analysers to monitor the process before water is introduced to the network.
5.9 Tasman District Council (TDC) supplies water to the residential area in south Nelson adjacent to Champion Road and Hill Street North (and to Richmond) from underground bores and then treat this water with ultra-violet light prior to supplying the network. While this form of treatment does not provide residual disinfection in the drinking water, TDC do have chlorine dosing equipment available for emergencies or if testing identifies the presence of E.Coli in the reticulation.
6. Options
6.1 The report is advisory only and does not require the evaluation of options.
7. Conclusion
7.1 The contamination incident in Havelock North is likely to lead to significant change in the drinking water supply environment.
7.2 The Nelson City Council supply is currently well positioned to comply with any treatment requirements that may arise from future changes to legislation.
Phil Ruffell
Senior Asset Engineer - Utilities
Attachments
|
Important considerations for decision making |
|
1. Fit with Purpose of Local Government Council is the major provider of drinking water to the city and as such it meets the current and future needs of the community for a water supply. |
|
2. Consistency with Community Outcomes and Council Policy Provision of a good quality drinking water supply meets Council’s Community Outcome ‘Our infrastructure is efficient, cost effective and meets current and future needs’ |
|
3. Risk The report is advisory only and there are no recommendations for change to current operating procedures. There is no change to the current risk profile. |
|
4. Financial impact The report is advisory only and there are no immediate financial implications. |
|
5. Degree of significance and level of engagement This matter is of high significance because Council is the primary supplier of drinking water to the community. The report is advisory only and no community consultation is required at this stage. |
|
6. Inclusion of Māori in the decision making process Māori have not been involved in the development of the report. |
|
7. Delegations The Works and Infrastructure Committee has the responsibility for considering matters relating to the water supply. |
