|
|
|
|
|
|
When calling please ask for: |
Administration Adviser |
|
Phone: |
03 546 0200 |
|
|
30 June 2016
Memo to: Mayor and Councillors
Memo from: Administration Advisers
Subject: Council – 30 JUNE 2016 – LATE ITEM
1. Late Item: Special Housing Areas - Late Item 2 - 10
Document R6164
A report titled Special Housing Areas - Late Item is attached and to be considered as a major late item at this meeting.
Section 46A(1)-(6) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 and Standing Order 2.15.8 require that agendas are distributed with the associated reports. As this report was not distributed with the agenda for this meeting, it must be treated as a major late item to be considered at this meeting.
In accordance with section 46A(7) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 and Standing Order 3.7.5, a procedural resolution is required before a major item that is not on the agenda for the meeting may be dealt with.
In accordance with section 46A(7)(b)(i) the reason why the item was not on the agenda is because it came to hand after the agenda had been distributed.
In accordance with section 46A(7)(b)(ii) the reason why discussion of this item cannot be delayed until a subsequent meeting is because a resolution on the matter is required before the next scheduled meeting of the Council to enable a timely decision to be made.
Recommendation
THAT the item regarding Special Housing Areas - Late Item be considered at this meeting as a major item not on the agenda, pursuant to Section 46A(7)(a) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987, to enable a timely decision to be made.
|
Council 30 June 2016 |
REPORT R6164
Special Housing Areas - Late Item
1. Purpose of Report
1.1 To approve a potential Special Housing Area (SHA) at 69 Newman Drive.
1.2 To agree that Her Worship the Mayor recommend to the Minister of Building and Housing the SHA at 69 Newman Drive for consideration under the Housing Accord and Special Housing Areas Act 2013 (HASHA).
2. Recommendation
It is recommended that the Council
3. Background
3.1 This report provides an additional SHA for Council’s consideration, in addition to those to be considered in report R6101 to 30 June 2016 Council meeting.
4. Discussion
4.1 Since report R6101 was written, officers have received a further request for a SHA at 69 Newman Drive. Details of the SHAs proposed qualifying development criteria and an assessment of the costs, risks, benefits and permitted baseline are provided in Attachment 1.
5. Options
5.1 Council has the option of approving this SHA for recommendation to the Minister, or declining to recommend it to the Minister. The only risk associated with this SHA, is that the title contains a land covenant in favour of 34 parties stating that no more than one dwelling can be built on the site. In order to obtain and implement a consent for development, the Applicant will need to gain the agreement of all those parties for the removal of the covenant. The Applicant has advised that this is a risk she is willing to take. On this basis the SHA can be recommended for approval to the Minister.
Lisa Gibellini
Development Projects Planner
Attachments
Attachment 1: A1573116 - SHA 69 Newman Drive Assessment
Important considerations for decision making |
1. Fit with Purpose of Local Government The recommendations in this report are consistent with the purpose of local government and directly seek to achieve meeting “the current and future needs of communities for good-quality local infrastructure, local public services, and performance of regulatory functions in a way that is most cost-effective for households and businesses” |
2. Consistency with Community Outcomes and Council Policy The recommendations align with the direction set by Council for SHA’s at the 17 December 2015, 3 March 2016, 2 June and 16 June Council meetings and the Nelson Housing Accord. The recommendations are also consistent with achieving greater housing choice goals sought through Council’s Strategic documents, especially the strategic outcomes driving the Nelson Plan review. |
3. Risk HASHA, SHAs and Nelson Housing Accord provides an opportunity for Council to facilitate residential development in urban areas that are otherwise not occurring due to economic viability and process issues. If the SHA recommended in this report is not approved then there is a risk that development of that sites is not enabled, and the goal of furthering the supply of residential units as part of the Housing Accord is not met. |
4. Financial impact All infrastructure required to serve the SHAs is to be provided by the developer, unless it is a project that is scheduled in the Long Term Plan and funded via Development Contributions. All costs of the processing of SHA resource consent applications will be funded by the applicant. |
5. Degree of significance and level of engagement This matter is of low to medium significance because it does not significantly impact the community. The SHA recommended in this report is located in existing zoned residential land where development of the site is anticipated by the community. The establishment of the SHA recommended in this report will result in subsequent resource consent applications under HASHA for such development, and at that time engagement with adjacent landowners will occur if Council’s regulatory arm considers that they are affected. Overall, the establishment of the SHA recommended in this report will assist with increasing housing supply in Nelson which will be of benefit to the wider community. |
6. Inclusion of Māori in the decision making process Maori have not been consulted on this matter. |
7. Delegations No committee of Council has delegations for the Housing Accord and Special Housing Areas Act 2013 and therefore the matter needs to be considered by full Council. |